DGP vs. EASG
Compare and contrast key facts about DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG).
DGP and EASG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DGP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008. EASG is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Index. It was launched on Sep 6, 2018. Both DGP and EASG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DGP vs. EASG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DGP vs. EASG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | 16.89% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | -11.29% | 45.29% | 32.27% | 6.99% |
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 1.43% | 25.19% | 2.26% | 18.80% | -16.94% | 11.36% | 10.73% | 23.66% | -5.41% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGP achieves a 16.89% return, which is significantly higher than EASG's 1.43% return.
DGP
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -21.64%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 41.16%
- 1Y
- 107.27%
- 3Y*
- 64.55%
- 5Y*
- 39.08%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
EASG
- 1D
- 1.57%
- 1M
- -4.93%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 20.87%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 6.56%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DGP vs. EASG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGP has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EASG's 0.14% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DGP vs. EASG — Risk / Return Rank
DGP
EASG
DGP vs. EASG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) and Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DGP | EASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.95 | 1.17 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.32 | 1.68 | +0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.92 | 1.81 | +1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.08 | 6.81 | +4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGP | EASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 1.17 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | 0.40 | +0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.47 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between DGP and EASG is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
DGP vs. EASG - Dividend Comparison
DGP has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EASG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EASG Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF | 4.12% | 4.18% | 2.93% | 2.51% | 2.47% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.94% | 0.85% |
Drawdowns
DGP vs. EASG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGP drawdown since its inception was -75.31%, which is greater than EASG's maximum drawdown of -32.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGP and EASG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGP | EASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.31% | -32.06% | -43.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.58% | -11.74% | -24.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.24% | -31.42% | -19.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.22% | -7.02% | -15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -41.24% | -6.27% | -34.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.64% | 3.11% | +6.53% |
Volatility
DGP vs. EASG - Volatility Comparison
DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) has a higher volatility of 24.21% compared to Xtrackers MSCI EAFE ESG Leaders Equity ETF (EASG) at 7.31%. This indicates that DGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EASG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DGP | EASG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 24.21% | 7.31% | +16.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.07% | 11.72% | +36.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.32% | 17.86% | +37.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.34% | 16.51% | +21.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.93% | 18.35% | +16.58% |