DGLO vs. FNDB
DGLO (First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DGLO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by First Trust, while FNDB is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US All Index. DGLO is actively managed, while FNDB is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DGLO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.
Performance
DGLO vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DGLO achieves a 15.52% return, which is significantly higher than FNDB's 13.46% return.
DGLO
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- 15.52%
- 6M
- 14.88%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FNDB
- 1D
- -1.61%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 13.46%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- 1Y
- 31.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.04%
- 5Y*
- 12.19%
- 10Y*
- 13.79%
DGLO vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DGLO First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF | 15.52% | 3.03% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 13.46% | 11.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DGLO and FNDB is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2025 | 0.81 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DGLO vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank
DGLO
FNDB
DGLO vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF (DGLO) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DGLO | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.78 | +0.74 |
Drawdowns
DGLO vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DGLO drawdown since its inception was -7.74%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGLO and FNDB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DGLO | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.74% | -38.17% | +30.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.61% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.05% | -3.66% | +1.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.64% | — |
Volatility
DGLO vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DGLO | FNDB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.80% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 10.86% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 15.38% | +0.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.45% | 17.48% | -2.03% |
DGLO vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DGLO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
DGLO vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison
DGLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than FNDB's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGLO First Trust RBA Deglobalization ETF | 0.48% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF | 1.46% | 1.62% | 1.74% | 1.80% | 1.98% | 1.63% | 2.15% | 2.23% | 2.41% | 1.91% | 2.06% | 2.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DGLO and FNDB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FNDB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FNDB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DGLO.
FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.48% for DGLO.
DGLO is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDB is Large Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DGLO and 0.25% for FNDB.
Find the right allocation for DGLO and FNDB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer