PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGCB vs. DUHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGCB vs. DUHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGCB achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than DUHP's 9.51% return.


DGCB

1D
0.03%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.40%
1Y
6.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DUHP

1D
0.27%
1M
6.05%
YTD
9.51%
6M
9.93%
1Y
21.98%
3Y*
19.38%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGCB vs. DUHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
1.43%6.68%3.80%6.14%
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
9.51%13.77%19.49%9.60%

Correlation

The correlation between DGCB and DUHP is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2023

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGCB vs. DUHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGCB
DGCB Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
DGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
DGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

DUHP
DUHP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DUHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DUHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DUHP Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DUHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DUHP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGCB vs. DUHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) and DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGCBDUHPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.56

1.97

-0.41

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.26

2.81

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.50

-0.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.80

10.94

-4.14

DGCB vs. DUHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is comparable to the DUHP Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGCB and DUHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGCBDUHPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.56

1.97

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.49

0.87

+0.61

Drawdowns

DGCB vs. DUHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGCB drawdown since its inception was -3.50%, smaller than the maximum DUHP drawdown of -20.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGCB and DUHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGCBDUHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.50%

-20.05%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.08%

-8.99%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.80%

-4.04%

+3.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

2.05%

-1.18%

Volatility

DGCB vs. DUHP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Global Credit ETF (DGCB) is 1.47%, while DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) has a volatility of 2.50%. This indicates that DGCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DUHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGCBDUHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.47%

2.50%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.18%

8.63%

-5.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.97%

11.24%

-7.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.82%

16.24%

-11.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.82%

16.24%

-11.42%

DGCB vs. DUHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGCB has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DUHP's 0.21% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DGCB vs. DUHP - Dividend Comparison

DGCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than DUHP's 0.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DGCB
Dimensional Global Credit ETF
3.22%3.43%4.72%0.63%0.00%
DUHP
DFA Dimensional US High Profitability ETF
0.97%1.02%1.13%1.51%1.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGCB and DUHP have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DUHP has higher volatility (2.50%) compared to DGCB (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGCB dropped -3.50% vs DUHP's -20.05%.

On 1-year performance, DUHP leads with 21.98% vs 6.15% for DGCB. On fees, DGCB is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DGCB has been the lower-risk option at 1.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DUHP has performed better with a 21.98% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGCB is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.21% for DUHP.

DGCB has the higher dividend yield at 3.22%, compared with 0.97% for DUHP.

DGCB is categorized as Global Bonds, while DUHP is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DGCB and 0.21% for DUHP.

DUHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGCB and DUHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer