PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DGBEX vs. VGPMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DGBEX vs. VGPMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DGBEX achieves a 14.80% return, which is significantly lower than VGPMX's 21.14% return.


DGBEX

1D
0.55%
1M
6.16%
YTD
14.80%
6M
16.17%
1Y
32.78%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*

VGPMX

1D
1.33%
1M
6.96%
YTD
21.14%
6M
25.95%
1Y
66.86%
3Y*
31.54%
5Y*
20.51%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGBEX vs. VGPMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
DGBEX
DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio
14.80%22.39%15.72%22.33%-17.76%20.94%12.88%3.93%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
21.14%65.96%5.78%10.06%7.34%19.50%17.21%5.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DGBEX and VGPMX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2019

0.80

The correlation between DGBEX and VGPMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DGBEX vs. VGPMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGBEX
DGBEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DGBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VGPMX
VGPMX Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
VGPMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGPMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGPMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
VGPMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGPMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGBEX vs. VGPMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DGBEXVGPMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.69

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

5.25

-1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.25

21.90

-7.65

DGBEX vs. VGPMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGBEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is lower than the VGPMX Sharpe Ratio of 4.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGBEX and VGPMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DGBEXVGPMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

4.02

-1.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

1.19

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.26

+0.45

Drawdowns

DGBEX vs. VGPMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGBEX drawdown since its inception was -37.83%, smaller than the maximum VGPMX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGBEX and VGPMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DGBEXVGPMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.83%

-78.85%

+41.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-12.80%

+2.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.44%

-14.63%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.97%

-22.71%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-34.55%

+28.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.35%

3.06%

-0.71%

Volatility

DGBEX vs. VGPMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) is 3.97%, while Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund (VGPMX) has a volatility of 5.98%. This indicates that DGBEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGPMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DGBEXVGPMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.97%

5.98%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

13.83%

-3.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.96%

16.76%

-3.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

17.38%

-1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.38%

20.87%

-1.49%

DGBEX vs. VGPMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGBEX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is lower than VGPMX's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DGBEX vs. VGPMX - Dividend Comparison

DGBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than VGPMX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGBEX
DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio
1.44%1.50%2.73%1.85%1.79%2.81%2.24%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGPMX
Vanguard Global Capital Cycles Fund
3.22%2.59%2.68%3.22%3.27%3.26%2.03%2.39%3.02%0.02%1.72%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


DGBEX and VGPMX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGPMX has higher volatility (5.98%) compared to DGBEX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGBEX dropped -37.83% vs VGPMX's -78.85%.

VGPMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.02 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DGBEX and VGPMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer