DGBEX vs. UCEQX

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

DGBEX (DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio) and UCEQX (USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, DGBEX returned 11.06%/yr vs 10.96%/yr for UCEQX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DGBEX charges 0.34%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for UCEQX.

Performance

DGBEX vs. UCEQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with DGBEX having a 13.39% return and UCEQX slightly higher at 13.97%.

DGBEX

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 10.20%
• YTD: 13.39%
• 1Y: 24.79%
• 3Y*: 20.40%
• 5Y*: 11.06%
• 10Y*: —

UCEQX

• 1D: 0.82%
• 1M: 0.82%
• 6M: 11.05%
• YTD: 13.97%
• 1Y: 26.17%
• 3Y*: 20.67%
• 5Y*: 10.96%
• 10Y*: 11.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DGBEX vs. UCEQX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
DGBEX DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio	13.39%	22.39%	15.72%	22.33%	-17.76%	20.94%	12.88%	3.93%
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund	13.97%	23.71%	14.50%	19.36%	-16.25%	19.68%	10.76%	4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DGBEX and UCEQX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2019	0.96

The correlation between DGBEX and UCEQX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DGBEX vs. UCEQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DGBEX

DGBEX Risk / Return Rank: 64
DGBEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
DGBEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
DGBEX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
DGBEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
DGBEX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

UCEQX

UCEQX Risk / Return Rank: 77
UCEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UCEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
UCEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
UCEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
UCEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DGBEX vs. UCEQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) and USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DGBEX	UCEQX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.96	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.51	2.71	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.36	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	2.87	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.09	12.38	-2.29

DGBEX vs. UCEQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DGBEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the UCEQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DGBEX and UCEQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DGBEX vs. UCEQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DGBEX drawdown since its inception was -37.83%, which is greater than UCEQX's maximum drawdown of -35.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DGBEX and UCEQX.

Drawdown Indicators

	DGBEX	UCEQX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.83%	-35.33%	-2.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.32%	-8.96%	-1.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.44%	-15.64%	-1.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.97%	-25.24%	-1.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-35.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.23%	-0.59%	-0.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.15%	-4.84%	-1.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.07%	+0.37%

Volatility

DGBEX vs. UCEQX - Volatility Comparison

DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio (DGBEX) has a higher volatility of 4.97% compared to USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund (UCEQX) at 4.65%. This indicates that DGBEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UCEQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DGBEX	UCEQX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.97%	4.65%	+0.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.71%	10.89%	+0.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.84%	13.12%	+0.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.47%	15.39%	+1.08%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.36%	16.44%	+2.92%

DGBEX vs. UCEQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DGBEX has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than UCEQX's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

DGBEX vs. UCEQX - Dividend Comparison

DGBEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, less than UCEQX's 4.45% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DGBEX DFA Global Social Core Equity Portfolio	1.50%	1.50%	2.73%	1.85%	1.79%	2.81%	2.24%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UCEQX USAA Cornerstone Equity Fund	4.45%	5.08%	2.56%	5.10%	6.80%	4.61%	8.25%	4.79%	6.73%	1.91%	3.16%	3.63%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DGBEX and UCEQX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, DGBEX and UCEQX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DGBEX or UCEQX?

DGBEX has higher volatility (4.97%) compared to UCEQX (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DGBEX dropped -37.83% vs UCEQX's -35.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UCEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.