DFVE vs. MTUM
DFVE (Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFVE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Barclays Fortune 500 Equal Weighted Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MTUM is a Momentum fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, DFVE returned 23.82% vs 41.76% for MTUM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFVE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
DFVE vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFVE achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 31.75% return.
DFVE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.06%
- 1M
- 15.90%
- YTD
- 31.75%
- 6M
- 32.38%
- 1Y
- 41.76%
- 3Y*
- 34.75%
- 5Y*
- 15.21%
- 10Y*
- 17.31%
DFVE vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.31% | 14.51% | 13.70% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 31.75% | 22.15% | 23.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFVE and MTUM is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between DFVE and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFVE vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFVE
MTUM
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Industrials
DFVE
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
DFVE
MTUM
Financial Services
DFVE
MTUM
Technology
DFVE
MTUM
Healthcare
DFVE
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
DFVE
MTUM
Energy
DFVE
MTUM
Utilities
DFVE
MTUM
Basic Materials
DFVE
MTUM
Communication Services
DFVE
MTUM
Real Estate
DFVE
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFVE vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
DFVE
MTUM
DFVE vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFVE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.39 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 3.64 | -0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 14.50 | -3.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFVE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.20 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.85 | +0.24 |
Drawdowns
DFVE vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFVE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, smaller than the maximum MTUM drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVE and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFVE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -34.08% | +14.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -11.54% | +3.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | 0.00% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -6.21% | +3.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 2.89% | -0.70% |
Volatility
DFVE vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) is 2.98%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that DFVE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFVE | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 7.68% | -4.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 16.46% | -7.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 19.04% | -6.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 20.60% | -5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 21.03% | -5.47% |
DFVE vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFVE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFVE vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
DFVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, more than MTUM's 0.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.60% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFVE and MTUM have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to DFVE (2.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVE dropped -19.43% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 1-year performance, MTUM leads with 41.76% vs 23.82% for DFVE. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DFVE has been the lower-risk option at 2.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 41.76% return vs 23.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for DFVE.
DFVE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.60% for MTUM.
DFVE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MTUM is Momentum. DFVE tracks Barclays Fortune 500 Equal Weighted Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DFVE and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFVE and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer