DFVE vs. DABS
DFVE (Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF) and DABS (DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFVE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Barclays Fortune 500 Equal Weighted Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DABS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by DoubleLine. DFVE is passively managed, while DABS is actively managed. Over the past year, DFVE returned 23.82% vs 5.66% for DABS. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFVE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for DABS.
Performance
DFVE vs. DABS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFVE achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than DABS's 0.88% return.
DFVE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DABS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.88%
- 6M
- 1.22%
- 1Y
- 5.66%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFVE vs. DABS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.31% | 15.03% |
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 0.88% | 5.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFVE and DABS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFVE vs. DABS — Risk / Return Rank
DFVE
DABS
DFVE vs. DABS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFVE | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.47 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | 4.40 | -1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | 15.21 | -4.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFVE | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.28 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 2.05 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
DFVE vs. DABS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFVE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, which is greater than DABS's maximum drawdown of -1.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVE and DABS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFVE | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -1.47% | -17.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | -1.29% | -6.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.49% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -0.31% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | 0.37% | +1.82% |
Volatility
DFVE vs. DABS - Volatility Comparison
Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF (DABS) at 0.71%. This indicates that DFVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DABS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFVE | DABS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 0.71% | +2.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 1.60% | +7.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 2.49% | +10.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 2.56% | +13.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 2.56% | +13.00% |
DFVE vs. DABS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFVE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DABS's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFVE vs. DABS - Dividend Comparison
DFVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than DABS's 4.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
DABS DoubleLine Asset-Backed Securities ETF | 4.89% | 3.81% | 0.00% |
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFVE and DABS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFVE has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to DABS (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFVE dropped -19.43% vs DABS's -1.47%.
On 1-year performance, DFVE leads with 23.82% vs 5.66% for DABS. On fees, DFVE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DABS has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFVE has performed better with a 23.82% return vs 5.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFVE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for DABS.
DABS has the higher dividend yield at 4.89%, compared with 1.37% for DFVE.
DFVE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DABS is Nontraditional Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DFVE and 0.40% for DABS.
DABS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFVE and DABS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer