DFVE vs. BUFH
DFVE (Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFVE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Barclays Fortune 500 Equal Weighted Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFVE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
DFVE vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFVE achieves a 10.31% return, which is significantly higher than BUFH's 2.45% return.
DFVE
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- 2.49%
- YTD
- 10.31%
- 6M
- 10.69%
- 1Y
- 23.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 2.45%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFVE vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | 10.31% | 10.56% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.45% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFVE and BUFH is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFVE vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
DFVE
BUFH
DFVE vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF (DFVE) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFVE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.07 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.92 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFVE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 2.91 | -1.82 |
Drawdowns
DFVE vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFVE drawdown since its inception was -19.43%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFVE and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFVE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.43% | -1.53% | -17.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.48% | -0.05% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -0.18% | -2.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.19% | — | — |
Volatility
DFVE vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFVE | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.73% | 2.37% | +10.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 2.37% | +13.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 2.37% | +13.19% |
DFVE vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFVE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFVE vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
DFVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFVE Doubleline Fortune 500 Equal Weight ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 1.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFVE and BUFH have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFVE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFVE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
DFVE has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
DFVE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: DoubleLine and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for DFVE and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for DFVE and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer