DFUV vs. GCOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).
DFUV and GCOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFUV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016.
Performance
DFUV vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFUV vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 4.39% | 15.77% | 11.79% | 13.25% | 1.22% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 13.21% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 1.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 4.39% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.21% return.
DFUV
- 1D
- 2.00%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- 4.39%
- 6M
- 9.21%
- 1Y
- 19.52%
- 3Y*
- 15.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 13.21%
- 6M
- 20.65%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFUV vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFUV vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
DFUV
GCOW
DFUV vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUV | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 2.27 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.62 | 3.01 | -1.39 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.44 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 2.77 | -1.16 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.16 | 14.12 | -6.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUV | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 2.27 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.60 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUV and GCOW is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFUV vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than GCOW's 4.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF | 1.51% | 1.55% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.34% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.39% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
Drawdowns
DFUV vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUV | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.60% | -37.64% | +20.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.69% | -11.05% | -1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.13% | -1.84% | -2.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -5.90% | +2.12% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.17% | +0.68% |
Volatility
DFUV vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 4.03%. This indicates that DFUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFUV | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 4.03% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.16% | 7.90% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.33% | 13.89% | +3.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 13.48% | +2.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.45% | 16.25% | +0.20% |