DFUV vs. FNDB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

DFUV (Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF) and FNDB (Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. DFUV is actively managed, while FNDB is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUV returned 19.61%/yr vs 20.54%/yr for FNDB. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFUV charges 0.21%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FNDB.

Performance

DFUV vs. FNDB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUV achieves a 16.95% return, which is significantly higher than FNDB's 14.46% return.

DFUV

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 16.95%
• 6M: 18.53%
• 1Y: 34.65%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNDB

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: 3.71%
• YTD: 14.46%
• 6M: 14.53%
• 1Y: 32.19%
• 3Y*: 20.54%
• 5Y*: 12.39%
• 10Y*: 14.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUV vs. FNDB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	16.95%	15.77%	11.79%	13.25%	1.22%
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	14.46%	16.23%	16.25%	18.42%	-0.10%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUV and FNDB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022	0.96

The correlation between DFUV and FNDB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFUV vs. FNDB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFUV	FNDB
Financial Services	21.9%	14.1%
Technology	15.7%	18.8%
Healthcare	13.7%	11.6%
Industrials	13.6%	10.0%
Energy	12.9%	10.0%
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	9.4%
Basic Materials	6.0%	3.8%
Communication Services	5.1%	9.7%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	7.2%
Real Estate	0.4%	2.4%
Utilities	0.1%	3.1%

Return for Risk

DFUV vs. FNDB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUV

DFUV Risk / Return Rank: 88
DFUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
DFUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
DFUV Omega Ratio Rank: 85
DFUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
DFUV Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FNDB

FNDB Risk / Return Rank: 88
FNDB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FNDB Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
FNDB Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FNDB Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FNDB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUV vs. FNDB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFUV	FNDB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.96	3.02	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.12	4.23	-0.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.55	-0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.80	5.14	+0.66
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.03	19.75	+1.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFUV vs. FNDB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUV Sharpe Ratio is 2.96, which is comparable to the FNDB Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUV and FNDB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFUV	FNDB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.96	3.02	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.90	0.79	+0.11

Drawdowns

DFUV vs. FNDB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUV drawdown since its inception was -17.60%, smaller than the maximum FNDB drawdown of -38.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUV and FNDB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFUV	FNDB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.60%	-38.17%	+20.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.01%	-6.29%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.60%	-16.83%	-0.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.17%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-0.15%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-3.66%	+0.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.65%	1.63%	+0.02%

Volatility

DFUV vs. FNDB - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) has a higher volatility of 3.11% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF (FNDB) at 2.40%. This indicates that DFUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFUV	FNDB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.11%	2.40%	+0.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.47%	7.60%	+0.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.80%	10.72%	+1.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.24%	15.36%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.24%	17.48%	-1.24%

DFUV vs. FNDB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFUV has a 0.21% expense ratio, which is lower than FNDB's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFUV vs. FNDB - Dividend Comparison

DFUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FNDB's 1.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFUV Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF	1.35%	1.55%	1.64%	1.72%	1.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNDB Schwab Fundamental U.S. Broad Market Index ETF	1.44%	1.62%	1.74%	1.80%	1.98%	1.63%	2.15%	2.23%	2.41%	1.91%	2.06%	2.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFUV and FNDB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, DFUV and FNDB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFUV or FNDB?

DFUV has higher volatility (3.11%) compared to FNDB (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUV dropped -17.60% vs FNDB's -38.17%.

Which ETF is better, DFUV or FNDB?

On 3-year performance, FNDB leads with 20.54% vs 19.61% for DFUV. On fees, DFUV is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, FNDB has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFUV or FNDB?

Over the 3-year period, FNDB has performed better with a 20.54% return vs 19.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFUV or FNDB?

DFUV is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FNDB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFUV or FNDB?

FNDB has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 1.35% for DFUV.

What is the main difference between DFUV and FNDB?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.21% for DFUV and 0.25% for FNDB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNDB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.02 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.