DFUS vs. VIG
DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) and VIG (Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VIG is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index. DFUS is actively managed, while VIG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUS returned 22.42%/yr vs 16.49%/yr for VIG. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFUS charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VIG.
Performance
DFUS vs. VIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly higher than VIG's 7.57% return.
DFUS
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.79%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 6.99%
- 1Y
- 19.63%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
DFUS vs. VIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 11.90% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 7.57% | 14.17% | 16.99% | 14.51% | -9.80% | 12.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUS and VIG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between DFUS and VIG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFUS vs. VIG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUS
VIG
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
DFUS
VIG
Financial Services
DFUS
VIG
Technology
DFUS
VIG
Consumer Cyclical
DFUS
VIG
Industrials
DFUS
VIG
Energy
DFUS
VIG
Healthcare
DFUS
VIG
Utilities
DFUS
VIG
Consumer Defensive
DFUS
VIG
Basic Materials
DFUS
VIG
Real Estate
DFUS
VIG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUS vs. VIG — Risk / Return Rank
DFUS
VIG
DFUS vs. VIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 2.49 | +0.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.70 | 10.06 | +4.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 1.97 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.60 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
DFUS vs. VIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum VIG drawdown of -46.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and VIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -46.81% | +22.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -7.91% | -1.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -14.95% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -0.19% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -5.51% | -0.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 1.96% | -0.01% |
Volatility
DFUS vs. VIG - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) has a higher volatility of 3.07% compared to Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIG) at 2.19%. This indicates that DFUS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUS | VIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 2.19% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 7.57% | +1.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 10.01% | +2.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 14.23% | +2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 16.05% | +1.16% |
DFUS vs. VIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFUS has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VIG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUS vs. VIG - Dividend Comparison
DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, less than VIG's 1.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | 1.47% | 1.62% | 1.73% | 1.88% | 1.96% | 1.55% | 1.63% | 1.71% | 2.08% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFUS and VIG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFUS has higher volatility (3.07%) compared to VIG (2.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs VIG's -46.81%.
On 3-year performance, DFUS leads with 22.42% vs 16.49% for VIG. On fees, VIG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VIG has been the lower-risk option at 2.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFUS has performed better with a 22.42% return vs 16.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for DFUS.
VIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 0.83% for DFUS.
DFUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VIG is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for DFUS and 0.04% for VIG.
DFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUS and VIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer