DFUS vs. VGT
DFUS (Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. DFUS is actively managed, while VGT is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFUS returned 22.42%/yr vs 33.48%/yr for VGT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.09% expense ratio.
Performance
DFUS vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFUS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
DFUS
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 5.24%
- YTD
- 11.25%
- 6M
- 11.19%
- 1Y
- 28.63%
- 3Y*
- 22.42%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
DFUS vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 11.25% | 17.46% | 24.34% | 26.36% | -18.34% | 11.90% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 19.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFUS and VGT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between DFUS and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFUS vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFUS
VGT
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Energy
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
DFUS
VGT
Financial Services
DFUS
VGT
Technology
DFUS
VGT
Consumer Cyclical
DFUS
VGT
Industrials
DFUS
VGT
Energy
DFUS
VGT
Healthcare
DFUS
VGT
Utilities
DFUS
VGT
-
Consumer Defensive
DFUS
VGT
-
Basic Materials
DFUS
VGT
Real Estate
DFUS
VGT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFUS vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
DFUS
VGT
DFUS vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFUS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.47 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.21 | 3.69 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.70 | 11.77 | +2.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFUS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.35 | 2.95 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.79 | 0.68 | +0.11 |
Drawdowns
DFUS vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFUS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.62% | -54.63% | +30.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -16.40% | +7.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -27.23% | +7.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -1.48% | +0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.82% | -7.95% | +2.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.95% | 5.13% | -3.18% |
Volatility
DFUS vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) is 3.07%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that DFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFUS | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 6.39% | -3.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.18% | 16.07% | -6.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.23% | 20.57% | -8.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 25.18% | -7.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 24.60% | -7.39% |
DFUS vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both DFUS and VGT have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFUS vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | 0.83% | 0.88% | 1.04% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFUS and VGT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to DFUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 33.48% vs 22.42% for DFUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, DFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 33.48% return vs 22.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFUS and VGT have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.
DFUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.
DFUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard.
VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFUS and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer