PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFUS vs. VGT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFUS vs. VGT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFUS achieves a 11.25% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.


DFUS

1D
-0.66%
1M
5.24%
YTD
11.25%
6M
11.19%
1Y
28.63%
3Y*
22.42%
5Y*
10Y*

VGT

1D
-1.48%
1M
18.07%
YTD
31.64%
6M
30.51%
1Y
60.15%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
25.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFUS vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
11.25%17.46%24.34%26.36%-18.34%11.90%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
31.64%21.77%29.30%52.66%-29.70%19.16%

Correlation

The correlation between DFUS and VGT is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021

0.91

The correlation between DFUS and VGT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFUS vs. VGT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFUS
VGT

Communication Services

23.5%
0.5%

Financial Services

20.2%
0.5%

Technology

17.4%
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.0%
0.1%

Industrials

9.5%
0.4%

Energy

5.3%
0.3%

Healthcare

4.1%
0.0%

Utilities

3.0%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%
0.0%

Real Estate

0.0%

-

Communication Services

DFUS
23.5%
VGT
0.5%

Financial Services

DFUS
20.2%
VGT
0.5%

Technology

DFUS
17.4%
VGT
98.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DFUS
13.0%
VGT
0.1%

Industrials

DFUS
9.5%
VGT
0.4%

Energy

DFUS
5.3%
VGT
0.3%

Healthcare

DFUS
4.1%
VGT
0.0%

Utilities

DFUS
3.0%
VGT

-

Consumer Defensive

DFUS
2.6%
VGT

-

Basic Materials

DFUS
1.1%
VGT
0.0%

Real Estate

DFUS
0.0%
VGT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFUS vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFUS
DFUS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
DFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VGT
VGT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
VGT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VGT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGT Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFUS vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFUSVGTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.47

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.69

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.70

11.77

+2.93

DFUS vs. VGT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFUS Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the VGT Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFUS and VGT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFUSVGTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

2.95

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.68

+0.11

Drawdowns

DFUS vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFUS drawdown since its inception was -24.62%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFUS and VGT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFUSVGTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.62%

-54.63%

+30.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-16.40%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-27.23%

+7.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.48%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-7.95%

+2.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

5.13%

-3.18%

Volatility

DFUS vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF (DFUS) is 3.07%, while Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) has a volatility of 6.39%. This indicates that DFUS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFUSVGTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

6.39%

-3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.18%

16.07%

-6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.23%

20.57%

-8.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.21%

25.18%

-7.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.21%

24.60%

-7.39%

DFUS vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFUS and VGT have an expense ratio of 0.09%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFUS vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison

DFUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
0.83%0.88%1.04%1.33%1.48%0.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGT
Vanguard Information Technology ETF
0.31%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.64%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFUS and VGT have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGT has higher volatility (6.39%) compared to DFUS (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFUS dropped -24.62% vs VGT's -54.63%.

On 3-year performance, VGT leads with 33.48% vs 22.42% for DFUS. Both ETFs have the same 0.09% expense ratio. On volatility, DFUS has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VGT has performed better with a 33.48% return vs 22.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFUS and VGT have the same expense ratio: 0.09% per year.

DFUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.

DFUS is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VGT is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard.

VGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFUS and VGT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer