DFTT vs. SPXM
DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and SPXM (Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. DFTT is passively managed, while SPXM is actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for SPXM.
Performance
DFTT vs. SPXM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFTT
- 1D
- -3.68%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- 6M
- 13.63%
- YTD
- 17.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPXM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 8.72%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFTT vs. SPXM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 17.89% | -0.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.00% | 0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFTT and SPXM is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFTT vs. SPXM — Risk / Return Rank
DFTT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SPXM
DFTT vs. SPXM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF (SPXM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFTT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.11 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.87 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFTT vs. SPXM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, which is greater than SPXM's maximum drawdown of -5.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and SPXM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFTT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -5.08% | -5.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -5.08% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.03% | -0.75% | -8.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -0.78% | -1.66% |
Volatility
DFTT vs. SPXM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFTT | SPXM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.00% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.69% | 7.65% | +18.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 7.59% | +18.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.69% | 7.59% | +18.10% |
DFTT vs. SPXM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXM's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFTT vs. SPXM - Dividend Comparison
DFTT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than SPXM's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 0.14% | 0.00% |
SPXM Azoria 500 Meritocracy ETF | 0.24% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFTT and SPXM have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXM is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXM is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DFTT.
SPXM has the higher dividend yield at 0.24%, compared with 0.14% for DFTT.
They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and Azoria. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.47% for SPXM.
Find the right allocation for DFTT and SPXM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer