DFTT vs. SCHX
DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DFTT tracks the DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index while SCHX tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
DFTT vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFTT achieves a 22.90% return, which is significantly higher than SCHX's 7.70% return.
DFTT
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 22.90%
- 6M
- 20.64%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 7.70%
- 6M
- 6.36%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.63%
- 5Y*
- 12.29%
- 10Y*
- 15.44%
DFTT vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 22.90% | -0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 7.70% | -0.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFTT and SCHX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025 | 0.83 |
DFTT vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFTT
SCHX
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
DFTT
SCHX
Communication Services
DFTT
SCHX
Financial Services
DFTT
SCHX
Industrials
DFTT
SCHX
Healthcare
DFTT
SCHX
Utilities
DFTT
SCHX
Basic Materials
DFTT
-
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
DFTT
-
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
DFTT
-
SCHX
Energy
DFTT
-
SCHX
Real Estate
DFTT
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFTT vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
DFTT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHX
DFTT vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFTT | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.36 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.29 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFTT vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum SCHX drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFTT | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.46% | -34.33% | +23.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.16% | -3.41% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.18% | -3.96% | +1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.07% | — |
Volatility
DFTT vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFTT | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.84% | 12.63% | +11.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 17.22% | +6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.84% | 18.16% | +5.68% |
DFTT vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFTT vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
DFTT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFTT and SCHX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for DFTT.
SCHX has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for DFTT.
DFTT tracks DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 0.03% for SCHX.
Find the right allocation for DFTT and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer