DFTT vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

DFTT (DF Tactical 30 ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DFTT tracks the DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. DFTT charges 0.70%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

DFTT vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

DFTT

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 2.95%
• YTD: 22.90%
• 6M: 20.64%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: -0.25%
• 3Y*: 8.10%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.15%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFTT vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	22.90%	-0.00%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	-1.59%

Correlation

The correlation between DFTT and DFND is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 12, 2025	-0.10

DFTT vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFTT	DFND
Technology	51.0%	24.8%
Communication Services	17.2%	0.8%
Financial Services	16.1%	18.2%
Industrials	11.3%	17.1%
Healthcare	2.2%	10.7%
Utilities	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	4.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.5%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.2%
Energy	-	1.7%
Real Estate	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

DFTT vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DF Tactical 30 ETF (DFTT) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFTT	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.19	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.35	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.05	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.60	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	1.08	—

Drawdowns

DFTT vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFTT drawdown since its inception was -10.46%, smaller than the maximum DFND drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFTT and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFTT	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.46%	-22.65%	+12.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-3.44%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.56%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.16%	-3.69%	-1.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.18%	-5.70%	+3.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	DFTT	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.00%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	6.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.84%	10.88%	+12.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.84%	22.44%	+1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.84%	19.08%	+4.76%

DFTT vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFTT has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFTT vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFTT nor DFND has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.29%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
DFTT DF Tactical 30 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFTT and DFND in my portfolio?

DFTT and DFND have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, DFTT or DFND?

On fees, DFTT is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFTT or DFND?

DFTT is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFTT or DFND?

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for DFTT.

What is the main difference between DFTT and DFND?

DFTT tracks DF Risk-Managed Tactical Top 30 Index, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: Donoghue Forlines and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for DFTT and 1.50% for DFND.