DFSV vs. VTWV
DFSV (Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF) and VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. DFSV is actively managed, while VTWV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFSV returned 16.87%/yr vs 17.89%/yr for VTWV. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. DFSV charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for VTWV.
Performance
DFSV vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFSV achieves a 15.01% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 17.44% return.
DFSV
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 33.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWV
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.86%
- YTD
- 17.44%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- 41.49%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.32%
DFSV vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | 15.01% | 8.59% | 7.13% | 19.26% | 0.60% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 17.44% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -8.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFSV and VTWV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between DFSV and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFSV vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFSV
VTWV
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Financial Services
DFSV
VTWV
Industrials
DFSV
VTWV
Energy
DFSV
VTWV
Consumer Cyclical
DFSV
VTWV
Technology
DFSV
VTWV
Healthcare
DFSV
VTWV
Consumer Defensive
DFSV
VTWV
Basic Materials
DFSV
VTWV
Communication Services
DFSV
VTWV
Real Estate
DFSV
VTWV
Utilities
DFSV
VTWV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFSV vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank
DFSV
VTWV
DFSV vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFSV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.39 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.64 | 4.83 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | 16.46 | -4.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFSV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.95 | 2.30 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.31 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.44 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.49 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
DFSV vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFSV drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSV and VTWV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFSV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -45.73% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.39% | -8.64% | -0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.02% | -26.72% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -1.43% | +0.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.71% | -7.81% | +1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.95% | 2.53% | +0.42% |
Volatility
DFSV vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) is 3.95%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that DFSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFSV | VTWV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 5.06% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.28% | 12.15% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.63% | 18.17% | -0.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 21.72% | +0.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 23.54% | -1.30% |
DFSV vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFSV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFSV vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison
DFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than VTWV's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFSV Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF | 1.42% | 1.53% | 1.31% | 1.29% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.58% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, DFSV and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to DFSV (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSV dropped -28.02% vs VTWV's -45.73%.
On 3-year performance, VTWV leads with 17.89% vs 16.87% for DFSV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DFSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for DFSV.
VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.42% for DFSV.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for DFSV and 0.10% for VTWV.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFSV and VTWV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer