PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSV vs. VTWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSV vs. VTWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSV achieves a 15.01% return, which is significantly lower than VTWV's 17.44% return.


DFSV

1D
-0.84%
1M
1.32%
YTD
15.01%
6M
14.63%
1Y
33.99%
3Y*
16.87%
5Y*
10Y*

VTWV

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.86%
YTD
17.44%
6M
16.55%
1Y
41.49%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
10.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSV vs. VTWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFSV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
15.01%8.59%7.13%19.26%0.60%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
17.44%12.72%7.83%14.67%-8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSV and VTWV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.97

The correlation between DFSV and VTWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFSV vs. VTWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFSV
VTWV

Financial Services

27.5%
23.9%

Industrials

15.1%
11.9%

Energy

13.6%
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
9.2%

Technology

8.1%
10.0%

Healthcare

6.9%
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
2.2%

Basic Materials

5.4%
5.4%

Communication Services

2.6%
2.7%

Real Estate

0.9%
10.4%

Utilities

0.6%
5.2%

Financial Services

DFSV
27.5%
VTWV
23.9%

Industrials

DFSV
15.1%
VTWV
11.9%

Energy

DFSV
13.6%
VTWV
8.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DFSV
13.5%
VTWV
9.2%

Technology

DFSV
8.1%
VTWV
10.0%

Healthcare

DFSV
6.9%
VTWV
10.2%

Consumer Defensive

DFSV
5.8%
VTWV
2.2%

Basic Materials

DFSV
5.4%
VTWV
5.4%

Communication Services

DFSV
2.6%
VTWV
2.7%

Real Estate

DFSV
0.9%
VTWV
10.4%

Utilities

DFSV
0.6%
VTWV
5.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSV vs. VTWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSV
DFSV Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFSV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSV Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSV Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSV vs. VTWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSVVTWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

4.83

-1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.57

16.46

-4.89

DFSV vs. VTWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSV Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is comparable to the VTWV Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSV and VTWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSVVTWVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

2.30

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.49

+0.04

Drawdowns

DFSV vs. VTWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSV drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum VTWV drawdown of -45.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSV and VTWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSVVTWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.02%

-45.73%

+17.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-8.64%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.02%

-26.72%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-1.43%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-7.81%

+1.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.53%

+0.42%

Volatility

DFSV vs. VTWV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF (DFSV) is 3.95%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a volatility of 5.06%. This indicates that DFSV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSVVTWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.95%

5.06%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.28%

12.15%

-0.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

18.17%

-0.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.24%

21.72%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

23.54%

-1.30%

DFSV vs. VTWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFSV has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than VTWV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFSV vs. VTWV - Dividend Comparison

DFSV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, less than VTWV's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSV
Dimensional US Small Cap Value ETF
1.42%1.53%1.31%1.29%0.90%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.58%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, DFSV and VTWV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to DFSV (3.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSV dropped -28.02% vs VTWV's -45.73%.

On 3-year performance, VTWV leads with 17.89% vs 16.87% for DFSV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DFSV has been the lower-risk option at 3.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 17.89% return vs 16.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for DFSV.

VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 1.42% for DFSV.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for DFSV and 0.10% for VTWV.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSV and VTWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer