PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFSHX vs. SABA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFSHX vs. SABA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFSHX achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than SABA's 6.57% return. Over the past 10 years, DFSHX has underperformed SABA with an annualized return of 2.14%, while SABA has yielded a comparatively higher 2.99% annualized return.


DFSHX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.62%
6M
1.78%
1Y
4.38%
3Y*
5.18%
5Y*
1.99%
10Y*
2.14%

SABA

1D
-1.62%
1M
0.80%
YTD
6.57%
6M
2.61%
1Y
7.74%
3Y*
11.38%
5Y*
3.68%
10Y*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFSHX vs. SABA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
1.62%4.84%5.66%5.55%-6.24%-0.82%2.33%4.82%1.83%2.61%
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
6.57%-0.31%31.32%-2.77%-9.02%1.05%-6.63%8.55%-1.25%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between DFSHX and SABA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.15

The correlation between DFSHX and SABA shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (10 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFSHX vs. SABA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFSHX
DFSHX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
DFSHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFSHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFSHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DFSHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFSHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

SABA
SABA Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SABA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SABA Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SABA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
SABA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
SABA Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFSHX vs. SABA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) and Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFSHXSABADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.90

0.66

+2.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.58

1.11

+3.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.13

+0.68

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.44

0.74

+2.70

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.63

1.46

+13.17

DFSHX vs. SABA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFSHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is higher than the SABA Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFSHX and SABA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFSHXSABADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

0.66

+2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.25

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.18

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.43

+0.07

Drawdowns

DFSHX vs. SABA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFSHX drawdown since its inception was -9.58%, smaller than the maximum SABA drawdown of -32.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFSHX and SABA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFSHXSABADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.58%

-32.37%

+22.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.28%

-10.45%

+9.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.18%

-14.96%

+10.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.58%

-19.94%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.58%

-31.39%

+21.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-2.63%

+2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.29%

-7.57%

+5.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.30%

5.32%

-5.02%

Volatility

DFSHX vs. SABA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio (DFSHX) is 0.70%, while Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II (SABA) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that DFSHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SABA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFSHXSABADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.70%

3.98%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.36%

8.17%

-6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52%

11.79%

-10.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.37%

14.57%

-11.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.65%

16.66%

-14.01%

Dividends

DFSHX vs. SABA - Dividend Comparison

DFSHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.19%, less than SABA's 9.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFSHX
DFA Selectively Hedged Global Fixed Income Portfolio
4.19%4.26%4.50%3.90%0.04%1.77%0.03%2.52%3.23%1.75%1.63%1.11%
SABA
Saba Capital Income & Opportunities Fund II
9.38%9.65%8.32%11.43%9.14%7.19%4.00%6.68%5.81%4.44%4.63%4.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFSHX and SABA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SABA has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to DFSHX (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFSHX dropped -9.58% vs SABA's -32.37%.

DFSHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFSHX and SABA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer