DFS vs. LRCX
DFS (Discover Financial Services) and LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) are both stocks. DFS operates in Credit Services (Financial Services), while LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology). At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DFS vs. LRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 303.12%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
DFS vs. LRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFS Discover Financial Services | 0.00% | 15.88% | 57.32% | 18.20% | -13.55% | 29.78% | 10.13% | 46.94% | -21.80% | 8.92% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFS and LRCX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2007 | 0.42 |
The correlation between DFS and LRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (3 years) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DFS:
$10.25B
LRCX:
$21.68B
DFS:
$7.81B
LRCX:
$10.84B
DFS:
$4.40B
LRCX:
$6.10B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFS vs. LRCX — Risk / Return Rank
DFS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LRCX
DFS vs. LRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Discover Financial Services (DFS) and Lam Research Corporation (LRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.63 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 15.26 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 51.20 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFS vs. LRCX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -87.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -20.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -47.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -56.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.39% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -28.17% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.95% | — |
Volatility
DFS vs. LRCX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFS | LRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 21.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.63% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 52.78% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 46.57% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 44.92% | — |
Dividends
DFS vs. LRCX - Dividend Comparison
DFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFS Discover Financial Services | 0.00% | 0.35% | 1.62% | 2.40% | 2.35% | 1.63% | 1.94% | 1.98% | 2.54% | 1.69% | 1.61% | 2.01% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
DFS vs. LRCX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Discover Financial Services and Lam Research Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DFS and LRCX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for DFS and LRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer