PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNV vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNV vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 47.49% return.


DFNV

1D
1.41%
1M
3.25%
6M
13.45%
YTD
5.19%
1Y
8.91%
3Y*
18.30%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.69%

OILK

1D
-3.24%
1M
8.88%
6M
37.83%
YTD
47.49%
1Y
33.62%
3Y*
9.71%
5Y*
15.25%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
3.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.83K$15.31K$12.56K
$8.74M$7.86M$10.67M

DFNV vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
5.19%8.42%31.93%26.92%-24.05%18.51%3.29%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
47.49%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%63.71%5.34%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and OILK is -0.19, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020

0.04

The correlation between DFNV and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNV vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFNV
DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFNV vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNVOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.20

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

1.59

-1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

4.49

-3.53

DFNV vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNVOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-83.76%

+54.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.54%

-21.19%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-23.42%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-34.69%

+4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

-13.47%

+11.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.36%

-32.27%

+22.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.25%

7.52%

+1.73%

Volatility

DFNV vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 5.92%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 11.95%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNVOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.92%

11.95%

-6.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.91%

26.22%

-10.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.02%

30.24%

-11.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.93%

30.48%

-10.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

36.00%

-16.23%

DFNV vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both DFNV and OILK have an expense ratio of 0.69%.


Dividends

DFNV vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than OILK's 11.51% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
0.33%0.38%1.28%0.77%1.20%4.77%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil ETF
11.51%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNV and OILK have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (11.95%) compared to DFNV (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 5-year performance, OILK leads with 15.25% vs 8.34% for DFNV. Both ETFs have the same 0.69% expense ratio. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, OILK has performed better with a 15.25% return vs 8.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFNV and OILK have the same expense ratio: 0.69% per year.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 11.51%, compared with 0.33% for DFNV.

DFNV is categorized as Technology Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while OILK tracks Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and ProShares.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNV and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer