PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNV vs. NXTG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNV vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than NXTG's 51.79% return.


DFNV

1D
-0.18%
1M
10.83%
YTD
2.81%
6M
0.55%
1Y
7.23%
3Y*
18.75%
5Y*
9.65%
10Y*

NXTG

1D
-1.78%
1M
17.41%
YTD
51.79%
6M
52.46%
1Y
78.10%
3Y*
35.00%
5Y*
18.74%
10Y*
17.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNV vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
2.81%8.42%31.93%26.92%-24.05%18.51%2.92%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
51.79%28.46%12.85%28.74%-24.70%21.81%2.70%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and NXTG is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.74

The correlation between DFNV and NXTG shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFNV vs. NXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFNV
NXTG

Technology

60.9%
66.1%

Healthcare

16.2%

-

Communication Services

12.0%
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
0.4%

Industrials

1.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Real Estate

-

7.5%

Utilities

-

-

Technology

DFNV
60.9%
NXTG
66.1%

Healthcare

DFNV
16.2%
NXTG

-

Communication Services

DFNV
12.0%
NXTG
21.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFNV
9.0%
NXTG
0.4%

Industrials

DFNV
1.9%
NXTG
4.3%

Basic Materials

DFNV

-

NXTG

-

Consumer Defensive

DFNV

-

NXTG

-

Energy

DFNV

-

NXTG

-

Financial Services

DFNV

-

NXTG

-

Real Estate

DFNV

-

NXTG
7.5%

Utilities

DFNV

-

NXTG

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNV vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNV
DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

NXTG
NXTG Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
NXTG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NXTG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
NXTG Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
NXTG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
NXTG Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNV vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNVNXTGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.73

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

7.64

-7.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.81

29.86

-29.05

DFNV vs. NXTG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the NXTG Sharpe Ratio of 4.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and NXTG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNVNXTGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

4.24

-3.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

1.05

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.68

-0.15

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and NXTG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNVNXTGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-33.61%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.54%

-10.28%

-11.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-17.75%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-33.61%

+3.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.08%

-2.59%

-1.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-7.87%

-1.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.91%

2.62%

+6.29%

Volatility

DFNV vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 6.62%, while First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNVNXTGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.62%

8.51%

-1.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

15.41%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.67%

18.54%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.65%

17.94%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

18.88%

+0.85%

DFNV vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNV vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than NXTG's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
0.37%0.38%1.28%0.77%1.20%4.77%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NXTG
First Trust IndXX NextG ETF
1.13%1.56%1.51%2.15%2.04%1.97%1.04%0.77%1.27%1.65%1.23%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNV and NXTG have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NXTG has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to DFNV (6.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs NXTG's -33.61%.

On 5-year performance, NXTG leads with 18.74% vs 9.65% for DFNV. On fees, DFNV is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 6.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, NXTG has performed better with a 18.74% return vs 9.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFNV is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.

NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.37% for DFNV.

DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.70% for NXTG.

NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNV and NXTG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer