PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFNV vs. ITEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a 2.99% return, which is significantly lower than ITEQ's 17.19% return.


DFNV

1D
-2.01%
1M
11.80%
YTD
2.99%
6M
1.14%
1Y
7.73%
3Y*
19.01%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*

ITEQ

1D
-2.89%
1M
7.48%
YTD
17.19%
6M
20.44%
1Y
27.92%
3Y*
14.27%
5Y*
0.67%
10Y*
11.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
2.99%8.42%31.93%26.92%-24.05%18.51%2.92%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
17.19%13.71%11.70%4.70%-30.36%-8.04%8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNV and ITEQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2020

0.83

The correlation between DFNV and ITEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFNV
ITEQ

Technology

60.9%
58.7%

Healthcare

16.2%
2.3%

Communication Services

12.0%
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.0%
3.3%

Industrials

1.9%
16.6%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

2.0%

Financial Services

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

10.1%

Technology

DFNV
60.9%
ITEQ
58.7%

Healthcare

DFNV
16.2%
ITEQ
2.3%

Communication Services

DFNV
12.0%
ITEQ
1.4%

Consumer Cyclical

DFNV
9.0%
ITEQ
3.3%

Industrials

DFNV
1.9%
ITEQ
16.6%

Basic Materials

DFNV

-

ITEQ

-

Consumer Defensive

DFNV

-

ITEQ

-

Energy

DFNV

-

ITEQ
2.0%

Financial Services

DFNV

-

ITEQ
5.1%

Real Estate

DFNV

-

ITEQ

-

Utilities

DFNV

-

ITEQ
10.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFNV vs. ITEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNV
DFNV Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
DFNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFNV Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
DFNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFNV Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ITEQ
ITEQ Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
ITEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
ITEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFNVITEQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

2.15

-1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.87

5.76

-4.89

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNV Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the ITEQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNV and ITEQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFNVITEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

1.23

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.03

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.43

+0.11

Drawdowns

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum ITEQ drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and ITEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNVITEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.71%

-54.63%

+24.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.54%

-13.07%

-8.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.72%

-26.78%

+4.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

-50.29%

+20.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.91%

-13.17%

+9.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.47%

-18.52%

+9.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.90%

4.86%

+4.04%

Volatility

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 6.59%, while BlueStar Israel Technology ETF (ITEQ) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNVITEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.59%

7.71%

-1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.86%

17.33%

-2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.69%

22.77%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.66%

24.96%

-5.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.73%

23.40%

-3.67%

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is lower than ITEQ's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFNV vs. ITEQ - Dividend Comparison

DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%, less than ITEQ's 0.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFNV
TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF
0.37%0.38%1.28%0.77%1.20%4.77%0.02%
ITEQ
BlueStar Israel Technology ETF
0.72%0.85%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFNV and ITEQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITEQ has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to DFNV (6.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs ITEQ's -54.63%.

On 5-year performance, DFNV leads with 9.69% vs 0.67% for ITEQ. On fees, DFNV is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 6.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DFNV has performed better with a 9.69% return vs 0.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFNV is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for ITEQ.

ITEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.37% for DFNV.

DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while ITEQ tracks BlueStar Israel Global Technology Index. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.75% for ITEQ.

ITEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFNV and ITEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer