DFNV vs. FTEC
DFNV (TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF) and FTEC (Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - DFNV tracks the TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index while FTEC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFNV returned 7.20%/yr vs 19.77%/yr for FTEC. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DFNV charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FTEC.
Performance
DFNV vs. FTEC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNV achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than FTEC's 23.56% return.
DFNV
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- -4.71%
- 6M
- -6.49%
- 1Y
- -0.49%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- —
FTEC
- 1D
- -3.70%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 23.56%
- 6M
- 21.69%
- 1Y
- 47.58%
- 3Y*
- 30.58%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 25.28%
DFNV vs. FTEC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | -4.71% | 8.42% | 31.93% | 26.92% | -24.05% | 18.51% | 3.29% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 23.56% | 22.11% | 29.40% | 53.30% | -29.59% | 30.49% | 3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNV and FTEC is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2020 | 0.86 |
The correlation between DFNV and FTEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFNV vs. FTEC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFNV
FTEC
Technology
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
DFNV
FTEC
Healthcare
DFNV
FTEC
-
Communication Services
DFNV
FTEC
Consumer Cyclical
DFNV
FTEC
Industrials
DFNV
FTEC
Basic Materials
DFNV
-
FTEC
Consumer Defensive
DFNV
-
FTEC
-
Energy
DFNV
-
FTEC
Financial Services
DFNV
-
FTEC
Real Estate
DFNV
-
FTEC
-
Utilities
DFNV
-
FTEC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNV vs. FTEC — Risk / Return Rank
DFNV
FTEC
DFNV vs. FTEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) and Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFNV | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.35 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.02 | 2.94 | -2.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | 9.03 | -9.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFNV vs. FTEC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNV drawdown since its inception was -29.71%, smaller than the maximum FTEC drawdown of -34.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNV and FTEC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNV | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.71% | -34.95% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.54% | -16.26% | -5.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.72% | -27.30% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.71% | -34.95% | +5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -7.72% | -3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -5.57% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.12% | 5.28% | +3.84% |
Volatility
DFNV vs. FTEC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF (DFNV) is 7.72%, while Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) has a volatility of 11.42%. This indicates that DFNV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNV | FTEC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.72% | 11.42% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.32% | 18.65% | -3.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.09% | 22.79% | -4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 25.60% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 24.86% | -5.13% |
DFNV vs. FTEC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNV has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FTEC's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFNV vs. FTEC - Dividend Comparison
DFNV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than FTEC's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNV TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Innovation ETF | 0.40% | 0.38% | 1.28% | 0.77% | 1.20% | 4.77% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FTEC Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF | 0.36% | 0.43% | 0.49% | 0.77% | 0.93% | 0.63% | 0.83% | 1.03% | 1.20% | 0.96% | 1.25% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNV and FTEC have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTEC has higher volatility (11.42%) compared to DFNV (7.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNV dropped -29.71% vs FTEC's -34.95%.
On 5-year performance, FTEC leads with 19.77% vs 7.20% for DFNV. On fees, FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DFNV has been the lower-risk option at 7.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FTEC has performed better with a 19.77% return vs 7.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FTEC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for DFNV.
DFNV has the higher dividend yield at 0.40%, compared with 0.36% for FTEC.
DFNV tracks TrimTabs Donoghue Forlines Risk Managed Free Cash Flow Innovation Index, while FTEC tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: TrimTabs and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for DFNV and 0.08% for FTEC.
FTEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFNV and FTEC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer