DFNM vs. TAXI
DFNM (Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF) and TAXI (Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds. DFNM is actively managed, while TAXI is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFNM charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TAXI.
Performance
DFNM vs. TAXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFNM achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly higher than TAXI's 0.97% return.
DFNM
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 3.39%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TAXI
- 1D
- 0.15%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 0.97%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNM vs. TAXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | 1.27% | 2.90% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 0.97% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFNM and TAXI is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFNM vs. TAXI — Risk / Return Rank
DFNM
TAXI
DFNM vs. TAXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) and Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFNM | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.04 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.41 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.07 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFNM | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.57 | 2.95 | -2.38 |
Drawdowns
DFNM vs. TAXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFNM drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than TAXI's maximum drawdown of -2.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNM and TAXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFNM | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -2.23% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.38% | -0.77% | +0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.96% | -0.46% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | — | — |
Volatility
DFNM vs. TAXI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFNM | TAXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.29% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.77% | 1.90% | -0.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.54% | 1.90% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.54% | 1.90% | +0.64% |
DFNM vs. TAXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFNM has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXI's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFNM vs. TAXI - Dividend Comparison
DFNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, more than TAXI's 2.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF | 2.89% | 2.94% | 2.74% | 2.39% | 1.16% | 0.05% |
TAXI Northern Trust Intermediate Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 2.00% | 0.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFNM and TAXI have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TAXI is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TAXI is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DFNM.
DFNM has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 2.00% for TAXI.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DFNM and 0.05% for TAXI.
Find the right allocation for DFNM and TAXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer