DFNM vs. MUB

In the year-to-date period, DFNM achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly higher than MUB's -1.66% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

DFNM has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than MUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) and iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current DFNM Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is higher than the MUB Sharpe Ratio of 0.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNM and MUB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

DFNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, less than MUB's 3.15% yield.

The maximum DFNM drawdown since its inception was -6.98%, smaller than the maximum MUB drawdown of -13.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNM and MUB. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) is 0.85%, while iShares National AMT-Free Muni Bond ETF (MUB) has a volatility of 1.23%. This indicates that DFNM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.