DFNM vs. DUSB

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

DFNM (Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF) and DUSB (Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFNM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DUSB is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFNM returned 5.19% vs 4.18% for DUSB. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFNM charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for DUSB.

Performance

DFNM vs. DUSB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) and Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFNM achieves a 1.44% return, which is significantly lower than DUSB's 1.78% return.

DFNM

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.92%
• YTD: 1.44%
• 6M: 1.52%
• 1Y: 5.19%
• 3Y*: 3.20%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DUSB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.18%
• YTD: 1.78%
• 6M: 1.84%
• 1Y: 4.18%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFNM vs. DUSB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF	1.44%	3.87%	1.19%	5.03%
DUSB Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF	1.78%	4.53%	5.60%	1.79%

Correlation

The correlation between DFNM and DUSB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2023	0.07

Return for Risk

DFNM vs. DUSB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFNM

DFNM Risk / Return Rank: 80
DFNM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
DFNM Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
DFNM Omega Ratio Rank: 95
DFNM Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
DFNM Martin Ratio Rank: 59

DUSB

DUSB Risk / Return Rank: 99
DUSB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
DUSB Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
DUSB Omega Ratio Rank: 99
DUSB Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
DUSB Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFNM vs. DUSB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) and Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFNM	DUSB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.04	9.36	-6.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.39	21.28	-16.89
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.70	4.58	-2.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.84	42.69	-39.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.19	253.29	-243.10

DFNM vs. DUSB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFNM Sharpe Ratio is 3.04, which is lower than the DUSB Sharpe Ratio of 9.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFNM and DUSB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFNM vs. DUSB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFNM drawdown since its inception was -6.99%, which is greater than DUSB's maximum drawdown of -0.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFNM and DUSB.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFNM	DUSB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-0.29%	-6.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.84%	-0.10%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-2.82%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.22%	-0.06%	-0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.94%	-0.01%	-1.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.51%	0.02%	+0.49%

Volatility

DFNM vs. DUSB - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF (DFNM) has a higher volatility of 0.38% compared to Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF (DUSB) at 0.19%. This indicates that DFNM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DUSB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFNM	DUSB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.38%	0.19%	+0.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.29%	0.33%	+0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.72%	0.45%	+1.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.53%	0.52%	+2.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.53%	0.52%	+2.01%

DFNM vs. DUSB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFNM has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DUSB's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

DFNM vs. DUSB - Dividend Comparison

DFNM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, less than DUSB's 4.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
DFNM Dimensional National Municipal Bond ETF	2.89%	2.94%	2.74%	2.39%	1.16%	0.05%
DUSB Dimensional Ultrashort Fixed Income ETF	4.05%	4.32%	4.92%	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFNM and DUSB in my portfolio?

DFNM and DUSB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFNM or DUSB?

DFNM has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to DUSB (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFNM dropped -6.99% vs DUSB's -0.29%.

Which ETF is better, DFNM or DUSB?

On 1-year performance, DFNM leads with 5.19% vs 4.18% for DUSB. On fees, DUSB is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DUSB has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFNM or DUSB?

Over the 1-year period, DFNM has performed better with a 5.19% return vs 4.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFNM or DUSB?

DUSB is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DFNM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFNM or DUSB?

DUSB has the higher dividend yield at 4.05%, compared with 2.89% for DFNM.

What is the main difference between DFNM and DUSB?

DFNM is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while DUSB is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for DFNM and 0.15% for DUSB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DUSB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.36 vs 3.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.