DFND vs. SCHB
DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) and SCHB (Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index while SCHB tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DFND returned 7.15%/yr vs 15.28%/yr for SCHB. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFND charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHB.
Performance
DFND vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, DFND has underperformed SCHB with an annualized return of 7.15%, while SCHB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.28% annualized return.
DFND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 2.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 7.15%
SCHB
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 9.61%
- 1Y
- 27.05%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 12.43%
- 10Y*
- 15.28%
DFND vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 10.37% | 8.48% | 12.13% | -19.59% | 14.80% | 16.12% | 19.53% | -1.83% | 16.33% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 10.41% | 16.94% | 23.93% | 26.16% | -19.46% | 25.84% | 20.76% | 30.79% | -5.43% | 21.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFND and SCHB is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.50 |
Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and SCHB has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
DFND vs. SCHB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFND
SCHB
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Technology
DFND
SCHB
Financial Services
DFND
SCHB
Industrials
DFND
SCHB
Healthcare
DFND
SCHB
Basic Materials
DFND
SCHB
Consumer Defensive
DFND
SCHB
Consumer Cyclical
DFND
SCHB
Real Estate
DFND
SCHB
Energy
DFND
SCHB
Communication Services
DFND
SCHB
Utilities
DFND
-
SCHB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFND vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank
DFND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHB
DFND vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFND | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.94 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 3.05 | -2.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.08 | 13.57 | -12.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFND vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and SCHB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFND | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.65% | -35.27% | +12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.44% | -8.91% | +5.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.56% | -19.34% | +6.78% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.65% | -25.41% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.65% | -35.27% | +12.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.69% | -1.50% | -2.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.70% | -4.11% | -1.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.72% | 2.00% | +1.72% |
Volatility
DFND vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 4.80%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFND | SCHB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 4.80% | -4.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.10% | 10.00% | -3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 12.77% | -1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.44% | 17.34% | +5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.08% | 18.37% | +0.71% |
DFND vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFND vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison
DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.62% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHB Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF | 1.02% | 1.11% | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.61% | 1.21% | 1.63% | 1.80% | 2.00% | 1.65% | 1.86% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFND and SCHB have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHB has higher volatility (4.80%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFND dropped -22.65% vs SCHB's -35.27%.
On 10-year performance, SCHB leads with 15.28% vs 7.15% for DFND. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 15.28% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
SCHB has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.
DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.03% for SCHB.
SCHB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFND and SCHB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer