PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFND vs. ITOT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFND vs. ITOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, DFND has underperformed ITOT with an annualized return of 7.15%, while ITOT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.11% annualized return.


DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
2.18%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.15%

ITOT

1D
-1.30%
1M
-0.81%
YTD
8.94%
6M
7.85%
1Y
24.26%
3Y*
20.67%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*
15.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFND vs. ITOT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%16.12%19.53%-1.83%16.33%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
8.94%17.00%23.80%26.12%-19.47%25.68%20.71%30.67%-5.33%21.37%

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and ITOT is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between DFND and ITOT has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

DFND vs. ITOT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFND
ITOT

Technology

24.8%
37.2%

Financial Services

18.2%
11.4%

Industrials

17.1%
9.1%

Healthcare

10.7%
8.8%

Basic Materials

4.3%
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
9.8%

Real Estate

2.0%
2.3%

Energy

1.7%
3.3%

Communication Services

0.8%
9.8%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Technology

DFND
24.8%
ITOT
37.2%

Financial Services

DFND
18.2%
ITOT
11.4%

Industrials

DFND
17.1%
ITOT
9.1%

Healthcare

DFND
10.7%
ITOT
8.8%

Basic Materials

DFND
4.3%
ITOT
2.0%

Consumer Defensive

DFND
4.2%
ITOT
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DFND
3.5%
ITOT
9.8%

Real Estate

DFND
2.0%
ITOT
2.3%

Energy

DFND
1.7%
ITOT
3.3%

Communication Services

DFND
0.8%
ITOT
9.8%

Utilities

DFND

-

ITOT
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFND vs. ITOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


ITOT
ITOT Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ITOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITOT Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
ITOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITOT Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFND vs. ITOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNDITOTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.34

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

2.74

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

12.14

-11.06

DFND vs. ITOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the ITOT Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFND and ITOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFND vs. ITOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum ITOT drawdown of -55.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and ITOT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNDITOTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-55.20%

+32.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

-8.90%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

-19.44%

+6.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

-25.36%

+2.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

-35.00%

+12.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-2.79%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-6.96%

+1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

2.00%

+1.72%

Volatility

DFND vs. ITOT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNDITOTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.96%

-4.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

10.06%

-3.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

12.85%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.44%

17.46%

+4.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

18.28%

+0.80%

DFND vs. ITOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ITOT's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFND vs. ITOT - Dividend Comparison

DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%0.00%0.00%
ITOT
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
1.02%1.11%1.23%1.47%1.66%1.18%1.41%1.88%2.14%1.69%1.83%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFND and ITOT have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ITOT has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFND dropped -22.65% vs ITOT's -55.20%.

On 10-year performance, ITOT leads with 15.11% vs 7.15% for DFND. On fees, ITOT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ITOT has performed better with a 15.11% return vs 7.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ITOT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

ITOT has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.62% for DFND.

DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while ITOT tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.03% for ITOT.

ITOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFND and ITOT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer