PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFND vs. IIND.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFND vs. IIND.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

DFND is traded in USD, while IIND.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IIND.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
1.72%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.15%

IIND.L

1D
2.40%
1M
0.72%
YTD
-12.50%
6M
-11.05%
1Y
-12.09%
3Y*
5.13%
5Y*
3.62%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFND vs. IIND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.00%10.37%8.48%12.13%-19.59%14.80%16.12%19.53%-1.48%
IIND.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
-12.50%4.39%9.28%18.36%-8.26%25.80%13.87%7.88%-24.96%

Correlation

The correlation between DFND and IIND.L is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2018

0.23

The correlation between DFND and IIND.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFND vs. IIND.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFND
IIND.L

Technology

24.8%
8.2%

Financial Services

18.2%
29.5%

Industrials

17.1%
10.3%

Healthcare

10.7%
6.0%

Basic Materials

4.3%
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

3.5%
11.9%

Real Estate

2.0%
1.3%

Energy

1.7%
9.2%

Communication Services

0.8%
5.1%

Utilities

-

4.4%

Technology

DFND
24.8%
IIND.L
8.2%

Financial Services

DFND
18.2%
IIND.L
29.5%

Industrials

DFND
17.1%
IIND.L
10.3%

Healthcare

DFND
10.7%
IIND.L
6.0%

Basic Materials

DFND
4.3%
IIND.L
8.6%

Consumer Defensive

DFND
4.2%
IIND.L
5.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DFND
3.5%
IIND.L
11.9%

Real Estate

DFND
2.0%
IIND.L
1.3%

Energy

DFND
1.7%
IIND.L
9.2%

Communication Services

DFND
0.8%
IIND.L
5.1%

Utilities

DFND

-

IIND.L
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFND vs. IIND.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFND

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


IIND.L
IIND.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
IIND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IIND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
IIND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
IIND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IIND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFND vs. IIND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNDIIND.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

0.88

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

-0.63

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

-1.45

+2.53

DFND vs. IIND.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is higher than the IIND.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFND and IIND.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFND vs. IIND.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, smaller than the maximum IIND.L drawdown of -52.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and IIND.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNDIIND.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-52.15%

+29.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

-20.67%

+17.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

-24.89%

+12.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

-24.89%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-19.95%

+16.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-14.44%

+8.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

9.06%

-5.34%

Volatility

DFND vs. IIND.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) is 0.00%, while iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that DFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IIND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNDIIND.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

4.87%

-4.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

14.18%

-8.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

16.63%

-5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.44%

22.23%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

25.88%

-6.80%

DFND vs. IIND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IIND.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFND vs. IIND.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither DFND nor IIND.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%
IIND.L
iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFND and IIND.L have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IIND.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IIND.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

DFND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IIND.L is Asia Pacific Equities. DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index, while IIND.L tracks MSCI India NR USD. They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.65% for IIND.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFND and IIND.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer