IIND.L vs. 2B77.DE
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE).
IIND.L and 2B77.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IIND.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI India NR USD. It was launched on May 25, 2018. 2B77.DE is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the iSTOXX® FactSet Ageing Population. It was launched on Sep 8, 2016. Both IIND.L and 2B77.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IIND.L or 2B77.DE.
Key characteristics
| IIND.L | 2B77.DE | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 17.84% | 10.60% |
| 1Y Return | 25.03% | 13.43% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 11.61% | 1.64% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 14.20% | 5.94% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.66 | 1.19 |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.15% | 12.39% |
| Max Drawdown | -36.72% | -38.47% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.85% | -0.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IIND.L and 2B77.DE is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IIND.L vs. 2B77.DE - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IIND.L achieves a 17.84% return, which is significantly higher than 2B77.DE's 10.60% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IIND.L vs. 2B77.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IIND.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than 2B77.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IIND.L vs. 2B77.DE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) and iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IIND.L vs. 2B77.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IIND.L nor 2B77.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
IIND.L vs. 2B77.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IIND.L drawdown since its inception was -36.72%, roughly equal to the maximum 2B77.DE drawdown of -38.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IIND.L and 2B77.DE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IIND.L vs. 2B77.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI India UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IIND.L) is 3.59%, while iShares Ageing Population UCITS ETF (2B77.DE) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that IIND.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2B77.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.