PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFND vs. AFOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFND vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFND

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
2.16%
3Y*
8.10%
5Y*
4.54%
10Y*
7.15%

AFOS

1D
0.72%
1M
8.55%
YTD
36.79%
6M
36.01%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFND vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFND and AFOS is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFND vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFNDAFOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

DFND vs. AFOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFND vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFND drawdown since its inception was -22.65%, which is greater than AFOS's maximum drawdown of -11.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFND and AFOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFNDAFOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.65%

-11.52%

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

0.00%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.70%

-1.41%

-4.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.72%

Volatility

DFND vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFNDAFOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.88%

21.17%

-10.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.44%

21.17%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.08%

21.17%

-2.09%

DFND vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFND vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison

DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
AFOS
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF
0.22%0.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DFND
Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF
0.62%1.10%1.64%1.84%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.77%0.53%0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFND and AFOS have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.22% for AFOS.

They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.45% for AFOS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFND and AFOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer