DFND vs. AFOS
DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) and AFOS (ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFND charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AFOS.
Performance
DFND vs. AFOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
DFND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AFOS
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- 6M
- 20.26%
- YTD
- 29.03%
- 1Y
- 69.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFND vs. AFOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.00% | 1.03% |
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 29.03% | 37.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFND and AFOS is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFND vs. AFOS — Risk / Return Rank
DFND
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AFOS
DFND vs. AFOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) and ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF (AFOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFND | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.51 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 6.05 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 26.43 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFND vs. AFOS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFND | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -11.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.52% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.67% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -1.53% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.63% | — |
Volatility
DFND vs. AFOS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFND | AFOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 9.09% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.44% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 22.13% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.75% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.75% | — |
DFND vs. AFOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFND has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AFOS's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFND vs. AFOS - Dividend Comparison
DFND has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AFOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFOS ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF | 0.23% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF | 0.29% | 1.10% | 1.64% | 1.84% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.77% | 0.53% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFND and AFOS have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AFOS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AFOS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.
DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.23% for AFOS.
They also come from different issuers: SRN Advisors and ARS Investment Partners. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for DFND and 0.45% for AFOS.
Find the right allocation for DFND and AFOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer