PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFMC vs. RB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFMC vs. RB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFMC

1D
-1.12%
1M
1.77%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RB

1D
-0.17%
1M
1.63%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.48%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFMC vs. RB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFMC and RB is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026

0.71

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFMC vs. RB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and ProShares Russell 2000 Dynamic Daily Buffer ETF (RB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFMC vs. RB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFMCRBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.79

3.15

+1.65

Drawdowns

DFMC vs. RB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, which is greater than RB's maximum drawdown of -1.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and RB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFMCRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-1.70%

-2.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-0.47%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-0.41%

-0.43%

Volatility

DFMC vs. RB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFMCRBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

6.21%

+9.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

6.21%

+9.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

6.21%

+9.98%

DFMC vs. RB - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than RB's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFMC vs. RB - Dividend Comparison

DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DFMC and RB have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFMC is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFMC is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for RB.

RB has the higher dividend yield at 2.00%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.

DFMC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while RB is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.58% for RB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFMC and RB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer