PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFMC vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFMC vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


DFMC

1D
-1.12%
1M
1.77%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CALF

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.91%
YTD
13.34%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFMC vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFMC and CALF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2026

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFMC vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFMC

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFMC vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF (DFMC) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

DFMC vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFMCCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.79

0.37

+4.42

Drawdowns

DFMC vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFMC drawdown since its inception was -4.29%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFMC and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFMCCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-47.58%

+43.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.12%

-1.95%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.84%

-10.74%

+9.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

Volatility

DFMC vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFMCCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.19%

15.84%

+0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.19%

23.44%

-7.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.19%

26.02%

-9.83%

DFMC vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFMC has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFMC vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

DFMC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%
DFMC
Dimensional US Micro Cap Portfolio ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFMC and CALF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFMC is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFMC is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 0.00% for DFMC.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional Fund Advisors and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for DFMC and 0.59% for CALF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFMC and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer