DFIV vs. VOO
DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. DFIV is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIV returned 23.03%/yr vs 21.52%/yr for VOO. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFIV charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.
Performance
DFIV vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 9.75% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.45% return.
DFIV
- 1D
- -2.25%
- 1M
- -1.78%
- YTD
- 9.75%
- 6M
- 13.52%
- 1Y
- 32.62%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- -2.59%
- 1M
- 0.50%
- YTD
- 8.45%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 25.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 13.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
DFIV vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 9.75% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.45% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -18.17% | 7.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIV and VOO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between DFIV and VOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIV vs. VOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIV
VOO
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFIV
VOO
Energy
DFIV
VOO
Basic Materials
DFIV
VOO
Industrials
DFIV
VOO
Consumer Cyclical
DFIV
VOO
Healthcare
DFIV
VOO
Consumer Defensive
DFIV
VOO
Communication Services
DFIV
VOO
Technology
DFIV
VOO
Utilities
DFIV
VOO
Real Estate
DFIV
VOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIV vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
DFIV
VOO
DFIV vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.92 | +0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.09 | 13.53 | -0.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 2.15 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.88 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
DFIV vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and VOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -33.99% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -8.90% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.72% | -18.69% | +3.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.60% | -2.90% | +0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -3.69% | -0.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 1.92% | +0.58% |
Volatility
DFIV vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 3.74%. This indicates that DFIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIV | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.74% | +0.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 9.30% | +1.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 12.10% | +1.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 16.84% | -0.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.66% | 18.02% | -1.36% |
DFIV vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFIV vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.60% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.05% | 1.13% | 1.24% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIV and VOO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFIV has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to VOO (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs VOO's -33.99%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 21.52% for VOO. On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VOO has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 21.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.
DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.03% for VOO.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIV and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer