DFIV vs. VONE
DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) and VONE (Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while VONE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Index. DFIV is actively managed, while VONE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIV returned 23.03%/yr vs 21.14%/yr for VONE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFIV charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VONE.
Performance
DFIV vs. VONE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 10.17% return, which is significantly higher than VONE's 8.46% return.
DFIV
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VONE
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 0.42%
- YTD
- 8.46%
- 6M
- 8.48%
- 1Y
- 24.02%
- 3Y*
- 21.14%
- 5Y*
- 12.68%
- 10Y*
- 15.05%
DFIV vs. VONE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 10.17% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.50% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 8.46% | 17.21% | 24.51% | 26.41% | -19.14% | 6.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIV and VONE is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between DFIV and VONE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIV vs. VONE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIV
VONE
Financial Services
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFIV
VONE
Energy
DFIV
VONE
Basic Materials
DFIV
VONE
Industrials
DFIV
VONE
Consumer Cyclical
DFIV
VONE
Healthcare
DFIV
VONE
Consumer Defensive
DFIV
VONE
Communication Services
DFIV
VONE
Technology
DFIV
VONE
Utilities
DFIV
VONE
Real Estate
DFIV
VONE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIV vs. VONE — Risk / Return Rank
DFIV
VONE
DFIV vs. VONE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIV | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.36 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 2.73 | +0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.05 | 12.47 | +0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIV | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | 1.98 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.74 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.84 | +0.07 |
Drawdowns
DFIV vs. VONE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum VONE drawdown of -34.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and VONE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIV | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -34.66% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.66% | -8.85% | -0.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.72% | -19.06% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.23% | -2.59% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.47% | -3.90% | -0.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.50% | 1.93% | +0.57% |
Volatility
DFIV vs. VONE - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF (VONE) have volatilities of 3.83% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIV | VONE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 3.68% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.26% | 9.37% | +1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 12.22% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 17.12% | -0.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.65% | 18.27% | -1.62% |
DFIV vs. VONE - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VONE's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFIV vs. VONE - Dividend Comparison
DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VONE's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.59% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VONE Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.40% | 1.59% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.96% | 1.69% | 1.89% | 1.89% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIV and VONE have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFIV has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to VONE (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs VONE's -34.66%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 21.14% for VONE. On fees, VONE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, VONE has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 21.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VONE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 1.01% for VONE.
DFIV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while VONE is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.08% for VONE.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIV and VONE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer