PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIV vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIV vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIV achieves a 11.54% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return.


DFIV

1D
-0.70%
1M
2.57%
YTD
11.54%
6M
15.41%
1Y
34.88%
3Y*
23.90%
5Y*
10Y*

VEA

1D
-0.90%
1M
5.54%
YTD
14.92%
6M
18.15%
1Y
32.48%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.60%
10Y*
10.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIV vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
11.54%45.36%7.26%17.75%-3.70%0.08%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.92%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%-1.98%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIV and VEA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.93

The correlation between DFIV and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIV vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIV
VEA

Financial Services

32.4%
23.3%

Energy

16.4%
5.4%

Basic Materials

10.9%
7.5%

Industrials

9.6%
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
7.5%

Healthcare

4.9%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.6%

Communication Services

4.2%
3.4%

Technology

2.8%
13.8%

Utilities

2.5%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.7%

Financial Services

DFIV
32.4%
VEA
23.3%

Energy

DFIV
16.4%
VEA
5.4%

Basic Materials

DFIV
10.9%
VEA
7.5%

Industrials

DFIV
9.6%
VEA
19.2%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIV
9.6%
VEA
7.5%

Healthcare

DFIV
4.9%
VEA
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

DFIV
4.9%
VEA
5.6%

Communication Services

DFIV
4.2%
VEA
3.4%

Technology

DFIV
2.8%
VEA
13.8%

Utilities

DFIV
2.5%
VEA
3.3%

Real Estate

DFIV
1.8%
VEA
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIV vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIV
DFIV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
DFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIV vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFIVVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.38

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.63

2.81

+0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.02

10.94

+3.08

DFIV vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIV and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFIVVEADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

2.09

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.94

0.25

+0.69

Drawdowns

DFIV vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIVVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.42%

-60.68%

+35.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.66%

-11.63%

+1.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.72%

-13.45%

-1.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.90%

-0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-13.29%

+8.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

2.98%

-0.49%

Volatility

DFIV vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 3.89%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIVVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

5.66%

-1.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.99%

13.32%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.69%

15.66%

-1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

16.55%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.63%

17.36%

-0.73%

DFIV vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIV vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIV
Dimensional International Value ETF
2.55%2.92%3.88%3.93%3.84%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, DFIV and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to DFIV (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIV dropped -25.42% vs VEA's -60.68%.

On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.90% vs 19.77% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.89%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.90% return vs 19.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.27% for DFIV.

VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 2.55% for DFIV.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for DFIV and 0.03% for VEA.

DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIV and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer