DFIV vs. GVAL
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL).
DFIV and GVAL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFIV is an actively managed fund by Dimensional. It was launched on Apr 16, 1999. GVAL is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Mar 11, 2014.
Performance
DFIV vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFIV vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 5.98% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 5.70% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | -3.66% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with DFIV having a 5.98% return and GVAL slightly lower at 5.70%.
DFIV
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -5.65%
- YTD
- 5.98%
- 6M
- 15.53%
- 1Y
- 38.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GVAL
- 1D
- 3.01%
- 1M
- -6.45%
- YTD
- 5.70%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 23.32%
- 5Y*
- 13.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFIV vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIV has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than GVAL's 0.66% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFIV vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
DFIV
GVAL
DFIV vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIV | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.25 | 2.26 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.94 | 2.90 | +0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.47 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.32 | -0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.72 | 12.67 | +1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIV | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.25 | 2.26 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.32 | +0.57 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIV and GVAL is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFIV vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
DFIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, less than GVAL's 3.06% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.69% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 3.06% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
Drawdowns
DFIV vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIV drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, smaller than the maximum GVAL drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIV and GVAL.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIV | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.42% | -46.82% | +21.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.12% | -11.50% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.95% | -7.55% | +1.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.58% | -14.04% | +9.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 3.02% | -0.30% |
Volatility
DFIV vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) is 6.81%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 8.03%. This indicates that DFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFIV | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.81% | 8.03% | -1.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 11.33% | -0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.16% | 17.32% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 18.31% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 19.18% | -2.47% |