DFIS vs. KULR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

DFIS (Dimensional International Small Cap ETF) is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, DFIS returned 18.49%/yr vs -11.82%/yr for KULR. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

DFIS vs. KULR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIS achieves a 8.42% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 26.01% return.

DFIS

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -2.57%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 6M: 11.78%
• 1Y: 25.15%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KULR

• 1D: -2.10%
• 1M: 29.07%
• YTD: 26.01%
• 6M: -3.62%
• 1Y: -60.49%
• 3Y*: -11.82%
• 5Y*: -29.09%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIS vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF	8.42%	37.49%	3.80%	15.19%	-12.94%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	26.01%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-50.41%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIS and KULR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.26
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022	0.28

The correlation between DFIS and KULR shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (3 years) to 0.44 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

DFIS vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIS

DFIS Risk / Return Rank: 52
DFIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
DFIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
DFIS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
DFIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
DFIS Martin Ratio Rank: 50

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 19
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 21
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIS vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	DFIS	KULR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	-0.57	+2.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	-0.52	+2.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	0.94	+0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.03	-0.76	+2.79
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.79	-0.99	+8.79
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

DFIS vs. KULR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the KULR Sharpe Ratio of -0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIS and KULR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	DFIS	KULR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	-0.57	+2.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.23	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	-0.11	+0.75

Drawdowns

DFIS vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIS drawdown since its inception was -27.23%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIS and KULR.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFIS	KULR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.23%	-97.23%	+70.00%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.44%	-79.80%	+67.36%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.55%	-94.74%	+81.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-96.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.55%	-90.29%	+86.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.16%	-66.23%	+60.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.23%	60.84%	-57.61%

Volatility

DFIS vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) is 4.81%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 47.09%. This indicates that DFIS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFIS	KULR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	47.09%	-42.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.36%	76.46%	-64.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.80%	106.05%	-91.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.35%	126.05%	-108.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.35%	126.51%	-109.16%

Dividends

DFIS vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison

DFIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.05%, while KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFIS Dimensional International Small Cap ETF	2.05%	2.23%	2.19%	2.36%	1.13%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFIS and KULR in my portfolio?

DFIS and KULR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFIS or KULR?

KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to DFIS (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIS dropped -27.23% vs KULR's -97.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.