PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFII vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFII vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -26.30% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 18.21% return.


DFII

1D
1.51%
1M
4.16%
6M
-17.04%
YTD
-26.30%
1Y
-42.25%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-16.90%

RDVY

1D
0.81%
1M
2.01%
6M
12.29%
YTD
18.21%
1Y
31.80%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
16.08%
ALL TIME*
13.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$89.28K$83.20K$138.38K
$79.27M$78.43M$84.11M

DFII vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between DFII and RDVY is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFII vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFII
DFII Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFII vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFIIRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.83

1.38

-0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.83

3.54

-4.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.27

14.83

-16.11

DFII vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFII vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFIIRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.04%

-40.60%

-10.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.04%

-9.04%

-42.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.04%

0.00%

-47.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.48%

-4.95%

-17.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.20%

2.15%

+31.05%

Volatility

DFII vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.55%. This indicates that DFII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFIIRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

3.55%

+4.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.51%

11.40%

+21.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.22%

14.64%

+27.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.31%

18.93%

+21.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.31%

21.03%

+19.28%

DFII vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFII vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.88%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFII
FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF
25.88%15.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFII and RDVY have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFII has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to RDVY (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -51.04% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 1-year performance, RDVY leads with 31.80% vs -42.25% for DFII. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 31.80% return vs -42.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DFII.

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 25.88%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

DFII is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while RDVY is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFII and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer