DFII vs. ILS

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DFII (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF) and ILS (Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFII is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by First Trust, while ILS is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Brookmont. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, DFII returned -42.25% vs 7.79% for ILS. Their -0.11 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. DFII charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.58%/yr for ILS.

Performance

DFII vs. ILS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -26.30% return, which is significantly lower than ILS's 3.55% return.

DFII

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 4.16%
• 6M: -17.04%
• YTD: -26.30%
• 1Y: -42.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -16.90%

ILS

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 0.99%
• 6M: 3.01%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 1Y: 7.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 5.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF	$89.28K	$83.20K	$138.38K
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	$404.25K	$506.70K	$656.18K

DFII vs. ILS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF	-26.30%	6.01%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	3.55%	5.71%

Correlation

The correlation between DFII and ILS is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.09
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	-0.11

Return for Risk

DFII vs. ILS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFII

DFII Risk / Return Rank: 2
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 2

ILS

ILS Risk / Return Rank: 97
ILS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
ILS Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Omega Ratio Rank: 97
ILS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
ILS Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFII vs. ILS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFII	ILS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	3.17	-4.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.45	5.29	-6.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	1.74	-0.90
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	14.14	-14.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	53.05	-54.32

DFII vs. ILS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the ILS Sharpe Ratio of 3.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and ILS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFII vs. ILS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, which is greater than ILS's maximum drawdown of -2.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and ILS.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFII	ILS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.04%	-2.46%	-48.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.04%	-0.55%	-50.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.04%	0.00%	-47.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.48%	-0.50%	-21.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.20%	0.15%	+33.05%

Volatility

DFII vs. ILS - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF (ILS) at 0.42%. This indicates that DFII's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFII	ILS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	0.42%	+7.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.51%	1.47%	+31.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.22%	2.47%	+39.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.31%	3.64%	+36.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.31%	3.64%	+36.67%

DFII vs. ILS - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than ILS's 1.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFII vs. ILS - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.88%, more than ILS's 8.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF	25.88%	15.51%
ILS Brookmont Catastrophic Bond ETF	8.13%	6.06%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFII and ILS in my portfolio?

DFII and ILS have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFII or ILS?

DFII has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to ILS (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -51.04% vs ILS's -2.46%.

Which ETF is better, DFII or ILS?

On 1-year performance, ILS leads with 7.79% vs -42.25% for DFII. On fees, DFII is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, ILS has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFII or ILS?

Over the 1-year period, ILS has performed better with a 7.79% return vs -42.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFII or ILS?

DFII is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.58% for ILS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFII or ILS?

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 25.88%, compared with 8.13% for ILS.

What is the main difference between DFII and ILS?

DFII is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ILS is Nontraditional Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Brookmont. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 1.58% for ILS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.