DFII vs. EZET

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

DFII (FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF) and EZET (Franklin Ethereum ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. DFII is actively managed, while EZET is passively managed. Over the past year, DFII returned -42.25% vs -46.82% for EZET. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFII charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZET.

Performance

DFII vs. EZET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFII achieves a -26.30% return, which is significantly higher than EZET's -37.17% return.

DFII

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: 4.16%
• 6M: -17.04%
• YTD: -26.30%
• 1Y: -42.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -16.90%

EZET

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 9.78%
• 6M: -19.60%
• YTD: -37.17%
• 1Y: -46.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF	$89.28K	$83.20K	$138.38K
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	$386.84K	$489.30K	$667.67K

DFII vs. EZET - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF	-26.30%	6.01%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	-37.17%	54.99%

Correlation

The correlation between DFII and EZET is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2025	0.85

The correlation between DFII and EZET has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

DFII vs. EZET — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFII

DFII Risk / Return Rank: 2
DFII Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Omega Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DFII Martin Ratio Rank: 2

EZET

EZET Risk / Return Rank: 4
EZET Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
EZET Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
EZET Omega Ratio Rank: 4
EZET Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
EZET Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFII vs. EZET - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) and Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFII	EZET	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.01	-0.70	-0.30
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.45	-0.86	-0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.90	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.83	-0.69	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.27	-1.03	-0.24

DFII vs. EZET - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFII Sharpe Ratio is -1.01, which is lower than the EZET Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFII and EZET, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFII vs. EZET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFII drawdown since its inception was -51.04%, smaller than the maximum EZET drawdown of -67.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFII and EZET.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFII	EZET	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.04%	-67.89%	+16.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.04%	-67.89%	+16.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.04%	-61.49%	+14.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.48%	-35.25%	+12.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	33.20%	45.53%	-12.33%

Volatility

DFII vs. EZET - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF (DFII) is 8.02%, while Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) has a volatility of 12.15%. This indicates that DFII experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EZET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFII	EZET	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.02%	12.15%	-4.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.51%	45.67%	-13.16%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.22%	67.07%	-24.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.31%	71.26%	-30.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.31%	71.26%	-30.95%

DFII vs. EZET - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFII has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than EZET's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFII vs. EZET - Dividend Comparison

DFII's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 25.88%, while EZET has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
DFII FT Vest Bitcoin Strategy & Target Income ETF	25.88%	15.51%
EZET Franklin Ethereum ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFII and EZET in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, DFII and EZET move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, DFII or EZET?

EZET has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to DFII (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFII dropped -51.04% vs EZET's -67.89%.

Which ETF is better, DFII or EZET?

On 1-year performance, DFII leads with -42.25% vs -46.82% for EZET. On fees, EZET is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, DFII has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFII or EZET?

Over the 1-year period, DFII has performed better with a -42.25% return vs -46.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFII or EZET?

EZET is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DFII.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFII or EZET?

DFII has the higher dividend yield at 25.88%, compared with 0.00% for EZET.

What is the main difference between DFII and EZET?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for DFII and 0.19% for EZET.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EZET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.