PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFIC vs. SPDW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFIC vs. SPDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than SPDW's 15.00% return.


DFIC

1D
-0.71%
1M
2.87%
YTD
10.29%
6M
13.30%
1Y
27.29%
3Y*
19.43%
5Y*
10Y*

SPDW

1D
-0.87%
1M
5.56%
YTD
15.00%
6M
18.06%
1Y
32.15%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
10.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFIC vs. SPDW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
10.29%37.09%4.10%17.32%-9.27%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
15.00%34.75%3.55%17.81%-10.85%

Correlation

The correlation between DFIC and SPDW is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.98

The correlation between DFIC and SPDW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFIC vs. SPDW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFIC
SPDW

Financial Services

20.6%
22.9%

Industrials

20.2%
19.2%

Basic Materials

11.0%
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
7.8%

Energy

8.1%
5.5%

Technology

7.8%
13.7%

Healthcare

7.0%
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.1%
5.7%

Communication Services

4.3%
3.8%

Utilities

3.7%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
2.5%

Financial Services

DFIC
20.6%
SPDW
22.9%

Industrials

DFIC
20.2%
SPDW
19.2%

Basic Materials

DFIC
11.0%
SPDW
7.3%

Consumer Cyclical

DFIC
9.5%
SPDW
7.8%

Energy

DFIC
8.1%
SPDW
5.5%

Technology

DFIC
7.8%
SPDW
13.7%

Healthcare

DFIC
7.0%
SPDW
8.3%

Consumer Defensive

DFIC
6.1%
SPDW
5.7%

Communication Services

DFIC
4.3%
SPDW
3.8%

Utilities

DFIC
3.7%
SPDW
3.3%

Real Estate

DFIC
1.8%
SPDW
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFIC vs. SPDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFIC
DFIC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
DFIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIC Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIC Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

SPDW
SPDW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
SPDW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPDW Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPDW Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SPDW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPDW Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFIC vs. SPDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFICSPDWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.49

2.80

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.90

10.93

-1.03

DFIC vs. SPDW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFIC Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the SPDW Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFIC and SPDW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFICSPDWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.07

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.24

+0.57

Drawdowns

DFIC vs. SPDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum SPDW drawdown of -60.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and SPDW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFICSPDWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.40%

-60.02%

+35.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.00%

-11.55%

+0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.14%

-13.53%

+0.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.32%

-0.87%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-12.91%

+8.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

2.95%

-0.19%

Volatility

DFIC vs. SPDW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) is 4.34%, while SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF (SPDW) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that DFIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFICSPDWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

5.63%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.50%

13.17%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.85%

15.60%

-1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.21%

16.49%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.21%

17.26%

-1.05%

DFIC vs. SPDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFIC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than SPDW's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

DFIC vs. SPDW - Dividend Comparison

DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than SPDW's 2.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIC
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF
2.27%2.54%2.87%2.55%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPDW
SPDR Portfolio World ex-US ETF
2.87%3.30%3.19%2.75%3.12%3.04%1.87%3.13%3.08%1.86%3.11%2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, DFIC and SPDW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

SPDW has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to DFIC (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIC dropped -24.40% vs SPDW's -60.02%.

On 3-year performance, SPDW leads with 19.77% vs 19.43% for DFIC. On fees, SPDW is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, DFIC has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SPDW has performed better with a 19.77% return vs 19.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPDW is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for DFIC.

SPDW has the higher dividend yield at 2.87%, compared with 2.27% for DFIC.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DFIC and 0.04% for SPDW.

SPDW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFIC and SPDW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer