DFIC vs. IPOS
DFIC (DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. DFIC is actively managed, while IPOS is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIC returned 19.43%/yr vs 15.28%/yr for IPOS. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFIC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.
Performance
DFIC vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 40.15% return.
DFIC
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPOS
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 10.58%
- YTD
- 40.15%
- 6M
- 44.26%
- 1Y
- 65.50%
- 3Y*
- 15.28%
- 5Y*
- -7.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.00%
DFIC vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 10.29% | 37.09% | 4.10% | 17.32% | -9.27% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 40.15% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -14.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIC and IPOS is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between DFIC and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFIC vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIC
IPOS
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
DFIC
IPOS
Industrials
DFIC
IPOS
Basic Materials
DFIC
IPOS
Consumer Cyclical
DFIC
IPOS
Energy
DFIC
IPOS
Technology
DFIC
IPOS
Healthcare
DFIC
IPOS
Consumer Defensive
DFIC
IPOS
Communication Services
DFIC
IPOS
Utilities
DFIC
IPOS
Real Estate
DFIC
IPOS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIC vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
DFIC
IPOS
DFIC vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIC | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.41 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.83 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 11.58 | -1.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIC | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.24 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.09 | +0.72 |
Drawdowns
DFIC vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and IPOS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIC | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -73.09% | +48.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -17.17% | +6.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -34.08% | +20.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -69.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -40.44% | +39.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -31.99% | +27.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 5.67% | -2.91% |
Volatility
DFIC vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) is 4.34%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.05%. This indicates that DFIC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIC | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 12.05% | -7.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 26.45% | -14.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 29.41% | -15.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 27.19% | -10.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 24.13% | -7.92% |
DFIC vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFIC vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.27% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.68% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIC and IPOS have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IPOS has higher volatility (12.05%) compared to DFIC (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIC dropped -24.40% vs IPOS's -73.09%.
On 3-year performance, DFIC leads with 19.43% vs 15.28% for IPOS. On fees, DFIC is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, DFIC has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIC has performed better with a 19.43% return vs 15.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFIC is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.
DFIC has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.
They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DFIC and 0.80% for IPOS.
IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIC and IPOS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer