DFIC vs. DFAU
DFIC (DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF) and DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFIC is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFIC returned 19.43%/yr vs 21.70%/yr for DFAU. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFIC charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for DFAU.
Performance
DFIC vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFIC achieves a 10.29% return, which is significantly lower than DFAU's 11.32% return.
DFIC
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- —
DFIC vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 10.29% | 37.09% | 4.10% | 17.32% | -9.27% |
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 11.32% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -13.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFIC and DFAU is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between DFIC and DFAU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFIC vs. DFAU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFIC
DFAU
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
DFIC
DFAU
Industrials
DFIC
DFAU
Basic Materials
DFIC
DFAU
Consumer Cyclical
DFIC
DFAU
Energy
DFIC
DFAU
Technology
DFIC
DFAU
Healthcare
DFIC
DFAU
Consumer Defensive
DFIC
DFAU
Communication Services
DFIC
DFAU
Utilities
DFIC
DFAU
Real Estate
DFIC
DFAU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFIC vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank
DFIC
DFAU
DFIC vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFIC | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.43 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 3.30 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.90 | 15.10 | -5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFIC | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 2.38 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.94 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
DFIC vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFIC drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, roughly equal to the maximum DFAU drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFIC and DFAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFIC | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -23.61% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.00% | -8.67% | -2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.14% | -19.36% | +6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.32% | -0.67% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -4.99% | +0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 1.89% | +0.87% |
Volatility
DFIC vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison
DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) at 2.95%. This indicates that DFIC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFIC | DFAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.34% | 2.95% | +1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.50% | 9.04% | +2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.85% | 12.06% | +1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 17.02% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.21% | 16.73% | -0.52% |
DFIC vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFIC has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFIC vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison
DFIC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, more than DFAU's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.90% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.27% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFIC and DFAU have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFIC has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to DFAU (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFIC dropped -24.40% vs DFAU's -23.61%.
On 3-year performance, DFAU leads with 21.70% vs 19.43% for DFIC. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFAU has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 21.70% return vs 19.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for DFIC.
DFIC has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.90% for DFAU.
DFIC is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while DFAU is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for DFIC and 0.12% for DFAU.
DFAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFIC and DFAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer