DFEV vs. EMDV

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

DFEV (Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF) and EMDV (ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. DFEV is actively managed, while EMDV is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEV returned 19.57%/yr vs 1.66%/yr for EMDV. Their correlation of 0.80 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFEV charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for EMDV.

Performance

DFEV vs. EMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEV achieves a 18.44% return, which is significantly higher than EMDV's 1.51% return.

DFEV

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -3.76%
• 6M: 9.07%
• YTD: 18.44%
• 1Y: 35.77%
• 3Y*: 19.57%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 15.19%

EMDV

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 4.30%
• 6M: 0.72%
• YTD: 1.51%
• 1Y: 6.10%
• 3Y*: 1.66%
• 5Y*: -1.50%
• 10Y*: 1.95%
• ALL TIME*: 4.01%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	$13.02M	$11.82M	$9.92M
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	$3.04K	$6.93K	$10.37K

DFEV vs. EMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	18.44%	32.54%	7.26%	15.52%	-6.08%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	1.51%	11.90%	0.06%	-1.03%	-3.33%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEV and EMDV is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022	0.80

The correlation between DFEV and EMDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

DFEV vs. EMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	DFEV	EMDV
Financial Services	27.8%	24.0%
Technology	23.8%	22.8%
Basic Materials	11.0%	2.5%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	6.7%
Industrials	8.1%	6.7%
Energy	7.6%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	14.4%
Communication Services	2.3%	5.8%
Real Estate	2.2%	-
Healthcare	1.9%	8.4%
Utilities	0.9%	8.8%

Return for Risk

DFEV vs. EMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DFEV

DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 72
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 75
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 70

EMDV

EMDV Risk / Return Rank: 23
EMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
EMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
EMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 22
EMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
EMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 25

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DFEV vs. EMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) and ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	DFEV	EMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.66	0.50	+1.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	0.79	+1.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.10	+0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.56	0.81	+1.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.54	1.92	+6.62

DFEV vs. EMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is higher than the EMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEV and EMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

DFEV vs. EMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEV drawdown since its inception was -18.49%, smaller than the maximum EMDV drawdown of -39.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEV and EMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	DFEV	EMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.49%	-39.20%	+20.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.86%	-7.24%	-6.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.94%	-20.71%	+2.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.37%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.62%	-14.51%	+3.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.71%	-13.59%	+8.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.14%	3.04%	+1.10%

Volatility

DFEV vs. EMDV - Volatility Comparison

Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF (EMDV) at 3.09%. This indicates that DFEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	DFEV	EMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.10%	3.09%	+5.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.68%	9.93%	+9.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.40%	11.68%	+9.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.36%	15.41%	+1.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.36%	17.99%	-0.63%

DFEV vs. EMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEV has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than EMDV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

DFEV vs. EMDV - Dividend Comparison

DFEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than EMDV's 1.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
DFEV Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF	2.17%	2.69%	3.17%	3.47%	3.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMDV ProShares MSCI Emerging Markets Dividend Growers ETF	1.90%	2.46%	2.79%	1.88%	3.68%	2.12%	3.12%	2.38%	1.27%	2.09%	2.87%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both DFEV and EMDV in my portfolio?

DFEV and EMDV have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, DFEV or EMDV?

DFEV has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to EMDV (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEV dropped -18.49% vs EMDV's -39.20%.

Which ETF is better, DFEV or EMDV?

On 3-year performance, DFEV leads with 19.57% vs 1.66% for EMDV. On fees, DFEV is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, EMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, DFEV or EMDV?

Over the 3-year period, DFEV has performed better with a 19.57% return vs 1.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, DFEV or EMDV?

DFEV is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for EMDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, DFEV or EMDV?

DFEV has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.90% for EMDV.

What is the main difference between DFEV and EMDV?

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for DFEV and 0.60% for EMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DFEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.