DFEN vs. RING
DFEN (Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEN is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index (300%), while RING is a Gold fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, DFEN returned 29.22%/yr vs 18.76%/yr for RING. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. DFEN charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.
Performance
DFEN vs. RING - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEN achieves a 13.12% return, which is significantly higher than RING's -5.54% return.
DFEN
- 1D
- -2.71%
- 1M
- 7.74%
- YTD
- 13.12%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 76.99%
- 3Y*
- 64.38%
- 5Y*
- 29.22%
- 10Y*
- —
RING
- 1D
- 3.20%
- 1M
- -16.79%
- YTD
- -5.54%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 56.55%
- 3Y*
- 44.87%
- 5Y*
- 18.76%
- 10Y*
- 13.85%
DFEN vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 13.12% | 156.62% | 27.07% | 24.70% | 6.99% | 12.72% | -70.23% | 95.09% | -32.86% | 83.64% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | -5.54% | 164.72% | 15.98% | 12.29% | -15.40% | -7.46% | 24.98% | 49.92% | -13.14% | 5.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEN and RING is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 3, 2017 | 0.17 |
The correlation between DFEN and RING shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DFEN vs. RING - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFEN
RING
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
DFEN
RING
-
Technology
DFEN
RING
-
Basic Materials
DFEN
-
RING
Communication Services
DFEN
-
RING
-
Consumer Cyclical
DFEN
-
RING
-
Consumer Defensive
DFEN
-
RING
-
Energy
DFEN
-
RING
-
Financial Services
DFEN
-
RING
-
Healthcare
DFEN
-
RING
-
Real Estate
DFEN
-
RING
-
Utilities
DFEN
-
RING
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEN vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank
DFEN
RING
DFEN vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFEN | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.59 | +0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 4.45 | -0.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFEN vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEN drawdown since its inception was -91.36%, which is greater than RING's maximum drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEN and RING.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEN | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.36% | -79.47% | -11.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.75% | -35.72% | -6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.13% | -35.72% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.30% | -47.94% | -7.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.04% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.87% | -30.03% | +4.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.20% | -47.36% | +2.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.99% | 12.74% | +5.25% |
Volatility
DFEN vs. RING - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares (DFEN) has a higher volatility of 27.31% compared to iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) at 16.83%. This indicates that DFEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RING based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEN | RING | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.31% | 16.83% | +10.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.81% | 39.11% | +16.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.81% | 47.31% | +18.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 60.74% | 36.81% | +23.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.66% | 36.70% | +34.96% |
DFEN vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEN has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEN vs. RING - Dividend Comparison
DFEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than RING's 0.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEN Direxion Daily Aerospace & Defense Bull 3X Shares | 7.89% | 8.89% | 14.12% | 1.13% | 0.46% | 1.89% | 0.48% | 0.50% | 1.07% | 1.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF | 0.89% | 0.84% | 1.43% | 2.01% | 2.29% | 2.38% | 0.83% | 0.83% | 0.70% | 0.42% | 1.41% | 0.96% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEN and RING have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEN has higher volatility (27.31%) compared to RING (16.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEN dropped -91.36% vs RING's -79.47%.
On 5-year performance, DFEN leads with 29.22% vs 18.76% for RING. On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, RING has been the lower-risk option at 16.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DFEN has performed better with a 29.22% return vs 18.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DFEN.
DFEN has the higher dividend yield at 7.89%, compared with 0.89% for RING.
DFEN is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while RING is Gold. DFEN tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Aerospace & Defense Index (300%), while RING tracks MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for DFEN and 0.39% for RING.
RING currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFEN and RING
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer