PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFEM vs. STXE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFEM vs. STXE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFEM achieves a 20.81% return, which is significantly lower than STXE's 44.03% return.


DFEM

1D
-5.74%
1M
0.43%
YTD
20.81%
6M
21.36%
1Y
41.37%
3Y*
21.68%
5Y*
10Y*

STXE

1D
-6.43%
1M
6.24%
YTD
44.03%
6M
45.98%
1Y
75.87%
3Y*
28.56%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFEM vs. STXE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
20.81%29.51%7.53%5.28%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
44.03%34.23%2.09%12.38%

Correlation

The correlation between DFEM and STXE is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2023

0.86

The correlation between DFEM and STXE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFEM vs. STXE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFEM
DFEM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
DFEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEM Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEM Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

STXE
STXE Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
STXE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXE Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
STXE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFEM vs. STXE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DFEMSTXEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.52

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

5.26

-1.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.74

20.32

-7.58

DFEM vs. STXE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFEM Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is lower than the STXE Sharpe Ratio of 2.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFEM and STXE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DFEM vs. STXE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFEM drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, which is greater than STXE's maximum drawdown of -18.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEM and STXE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFEMSTXEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.82%

-18.92%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

-14.51%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.09%

-18.92%

+0.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-6.43%

+0.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-3.72%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

3.74%

-0.48%

Volatility

DFEM vs. STXE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) is 12.01%, while Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (STXE) has a volatility of 15.52%. This indicates that DFEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STXE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFEMSTXEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.01%

15.52%

-3.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.31%

24.95%

-5.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.16%

26.68%

-5.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

19.08%

-1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.94%

19.08%

-1.14%

DFEM vs. STXE - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFEM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than STXE's 0.32% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFEM vs. STXE - Dividend Comparison

DFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than STXE's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFEM
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF
1.89%2.32%2.50%2.38%1.99%
STXE
Strive Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF
1.87%2.66%3.22%1.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, DFEM and STXE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

STXE has higher volatility (15.52%) compared to DFEM (12.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEM dropped -20.82% vs STXE's -18.92%.

On 3-year performance, STXE leads with 28.56% vs 21.68% for DFEM. On fees, STXE is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, DFEM has been the lower-risk option at 12.01%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXE has performed better with a 28.56% return vs 21.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXE is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for DFEM.

DFEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 1.87% for STXE.

They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFEM and 0.32% for STXE.

STXE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFEM and STXE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer