DFEM vs. DEM
DFEM (Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF) and DEM (WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - DFEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DEM is a Dividend fund tracking the WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Index. DFEM is actively managed, while DEM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFEM returned 17.44%/yr vs 15.88%/yr for DEM. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. DFEM charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for DEM.
Performance
DFEM vs. DEM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFEM achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than DEM's 17.08% return.
DFEM
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -4.27%
- 6M
- 6.72%
- YTD
- 14.75%
- 1Y
- 29.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.40%
DEM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.60%
- 6M
- 10.28%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 1Y
- 24.73%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.90M | $9.48M | $10.87M | |
| $43.02M | $39.58M | $39.86M |
DFEM vs. DEM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 14.75% | 29.51% | 7.53% | 13.91% | -9.60% |
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 17.08% | 21.29% | 4.46% | 20.93% | -4.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFEM and DEM is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2022 | 0.89 |
The correlation between DFEM and DEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFEM vs. DEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFEM
DEM
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
DFEM
DEM
Financial Services
DFEM
DEM
Industrials
DFEM
DEM
Consumer Cyclical
DFEM
DEM
Basic Materials
DFEM
DEM
Communication Services
DFEM
DEM
Healthcare
DFEM
DEM
Energy
DFEM
DEM
Consumer Defensive
DFEM
DEM
Utilities
DFEM
DEM
Real Estate
DFEM
DEM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFEM vs. DEM — Risk / Return Rank
DFEM
DEM
DFEM vs. DEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DFEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.08 | 3.15 | -1.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | 9.50 | -2.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DFEM vs. DEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFEM drawdown since its inception was -20.82%, smaller than the maximum DEM drawdown of -51.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFEM and DEM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.82% | -51.85% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.84% | -7.89% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.09% | -15.64% | -2.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.18% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.46% | -3.57% | -6.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.08% | -12.82% | +7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 2.61% | +1.58% |
Volatility
DFEM vs. DEM - Volatility Comparison
Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF (DFEM) has a higher volatility of 8.15% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (DEM) at 5.12%. This indicates that DFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFEM | DEM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.15% | 5.12% | +3.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.62% | 13.28% | +7.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.46% | 15.02% | +7.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 15.60% | +2.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.17% | 17.85% | +0.32% |
DFEM vs. DEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFEM has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than DEM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
DFEM vs. DEM - Dividend Comparison
DFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than DEM's 4.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEM WisdomTree Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund | 4.18% | 4.88% | 5.24% | 5.49% | 8.62% | 5.87% | 4.21% | 4.78% | 4.47% | 3.67% | 3.63% | 5.21% |
DFEM Dimensional Emerging Markets Core Equity 2 ETF | 1.97% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.38% | 1.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFEM and DEM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFEM has higher volatility (8.15%) compared to DEM (5.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFEM dropped -20.82% vs DEM's -51.85%.
On 3-year performance, DFEM leads with 17.44% vs 15.88% for DEM. On fees, DFEM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, DEM has been the lower-risk option at 5.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFEM has performed better with a 17.44% return vs 15.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFEM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for DEM.
DEM has the higher dividend yield at 4.18%, compared with 1.97% for DFEM.
DFEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while DEM is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Dimensional and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for DFEM and 0.63% for DEM.
DEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFEM and DEM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer