DFAX vs. IPOS
Compare and contrast key facts about Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS).
DFAX and IPOS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. DFAX is a passively managed fund by Dimensional that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Country World ex USA Index. It was launched on Mar 6, 2008. IPOS is a passively managed fund by Renaissance Capital that tracks the performance of the Renaissance International IPO Index. It was launched on Oct 6, 2014. Both DFAX and IPOS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
DFAX vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
DFAX vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 5.34% | 35.42% | 4.78% | 16.66% | -14.48% | -2.68% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 11.50% | 39.93% | -12.34% | -16.49% | -33.46% | -20.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAX achieves a 5.34% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 11.50% return.
DFAX
- 1D
- 1.32%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- 5.34%
- 6M
- 10.06%
- 1Y
- 34.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.69%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IPOS
- 1D
- 3.33%
- 1M
- -9.87%
- YTD
- 11.50%
- 6M
- 8.27%
- 1Y
- 48.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- -11.43%
- 10Y*
- 0.53%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
DFAX vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
DFAX vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank
DFAX
IPOS
DFAX vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAX | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 1.68 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.70 | 2.11 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.33 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.84 | +0.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.07 | 8.62 | +3.45 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAX | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 1.68 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.01 | +0.53 |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAX and IPOS is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
DFAX vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison
DFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than IPOS's 0.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAX Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.43% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 3.01% | 3.30% | 1.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF | 0.85% | 1.04% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.89% | 1.12% | 0.87% | 1.73% | 1.08% |
Drawdowns
DFAX vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAX drawdown since its inception was -28.15%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAX and IPOS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAX | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.15% | -73.09% | +44.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.31% | -17.17% | +5.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -70.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -73.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.06% | -52.62% | +45.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -31.78% | +24.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.90% | 5.66% | -2.76% |
Volatility
DFAX vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) is 7.40%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 15.75%. This indicates that DFAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| DFAX | IPOS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.40% | 15.75% | -8.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.34% | 24.15% | -12.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.87% | 29.25% | -12.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 26.52% | -10.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.86% | 23.70% | -7.84% |