DFAU vs. DFIC
DFAU (Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF) and DFIC (DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DFAU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional, while DFIC is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, DFAU returned 21.70%/yr vs 19.43%/yr for DFIC. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DFAU charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for DFIC.
Performance
DFAU vs. DFIC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than DFIC's 10.29% return.
DFAU
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- 4.93%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 28.49%
- 3Y*
- 21.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.05%
- 10Y*
- —
DFIC
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 10.29%
- 6M
- 13.30%
- 1Y
- 27.29%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFAU vs. DFIC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 11.32% | 16.78% | 23.17% | 24.79% | -13.21% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 10.29% | 37.09% | 4.10% | 17.32% | -9.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFAU and DFIC is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022 | 0.76 |
The correlation between DFAU and DFIC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
DFAU vs. DFIC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DFAU
DFIC
Technology
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
DFAU
DFIC
Financial Services
DFAU
DFIC
Consumer Cyclical
DFAU
DFIC
Industrials
DFAU
DFIC
Communication Services
DFAU
DFIC
Healthcare
DFAU
DFIC
Consumer Defensive
DFAU
DFIC
Energy
DFAU
DFIC
Utilities
DFAU
DFIC
Basic Materials
DFAU
DFIC
Real Estate
DFAU
DFIC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFAU vs. DFIC — Risk / Return Rank
DFAU
DFIC
DFAU vs. DFIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFAU | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.36 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 2.49 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.10 | 9.90 | +5.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFAU | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.38 | 1.98 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 0.81 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
DFAU vs. DFIC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, roughly equal to the maximum DFIC drawdown of -24.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and DFIC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFAU | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -24.40% | +0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.67% | -11.00% | +2.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -13.14% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -1.32% | +0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.99% | -4.55% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 2.76% | -0.87% |
Volatility
DFAU vs. DFIC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) is 2.95%, while DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF (DFIC) has a volatility of 4.34%. This indicates that DFAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFAU | DFIC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 4.34% | -1.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.04% | 11.50% | -2.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.06% | 13.85% | -1.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 16.21% | +0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 16.21% | +0.52% |
DFAU vs. DFIC - Expense Ratio Comparison
DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFIC's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
DFAU vs. DFIC - Dividend Comparison
DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than DFIC's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAU Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF | 0.90% | 0.95% | 1.10% | 1.29% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 0.13% |
DFIC DFA Dimensional International Core Equity 2 ETF | 2.27% | 2.54% | 2.87% | 2.55% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DFAU and DFIC have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFIC has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to DFAU (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs DFIC's -24.40%.
On 3-year performance, DFAU leads with 21.70% vs 19.43% for DFIC. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFAU has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 21.70% return vs 19.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for DFIC.
DFIC has the higher dividend yield at 2.27%, compared with 0.90% for DFAU.
DFAU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFIC is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.23% for DFIC.
DFAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFAU and DFIC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer