PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DFAU vs. DFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DFAU vs. DFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DFAU achieves a 12.07% return, which is significantly lower than DFAX's 16.39% return.


DFAU

1D
0.31%
1M
5.21%
YTD
12.07%
6M
12.52%
1Y
30.31%
3Y*
21.97%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*

DFAX

1D
0.50%
1M
3.96%
YTD
16.39%
6M
19.78%
1Y
35.75%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DFAU vs. DFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
12.07%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%6.51%
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
16.39%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between DFAU and DFAX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.77

The correlation between DFAU and DFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

DFAU vs. DFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DFAU
DFAX

Technology

32.7%
10.9%

Financial Services

12.8%
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.9%

Industrials

10.4%
16.1%

Communication Services

10.4%
3.5%

Healthcare

8.5%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%
3.9%

Energy

4.6%
6.6%

Utilities

2.5%
4.2%

Basic Materials

2.4%
13.2%

Real Estate

0.2%
3.1%

Technology

DFAU
32.7%
DFAX
10.9%

Financial Services

DFAU
12.8%
DFAX
17.9%

Consumer Cyclical

DFAU
10.8%
DFAX
10.9%

Industrials

DFAU
10.4%
DFAX
16.1%

Communication Services

DFAU
10.4%
DFAX
3.5%

Healthcare

DFAU
8.5%
DFAX
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

DFAU
4.8%
DFAX
3.9%

Energy

DFAU
4.6%
DFAX
6.6%

Utilities

DFAU
2.5%
DFAX
4.2%

Basic Materials

DFAU
2.4%
DFAX
13.2%

Real Estate

DFAU
0.2%
DFAX
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DFAU vs. DFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DFAU vs. DFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DFAUDFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.53

2.43

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.43

3.25

+0.19

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

3.37

+0.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.33

13.35

+2.99

DFAU vs. DFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DFAU Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the DFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DFAU and DFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DFAUDFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.53

2.43

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.66

+0.29

Drawdowns

DFAU vs. DFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DFAU drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum DFAX drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFAU and DFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DFAUDFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.61%

-28.15%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.67%

-11.11%

+2.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-13.89%

-5.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.99%

-6.68%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.80%

-0.91%

Volatility

DFAU vs. DFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) is 2.88%, while Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that DFAU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DFAUDFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.88%

5.26%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

12.64%

-3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

14.82%

-2.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

15.98%

+1.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

15.98%

+0.76%

DFAU vs. DFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DFAU has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

DFAU vs. DFAX - Dividend Comparison

DFAU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.89%, less than DFAX's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
0.89%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.20%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DFAU and DFAX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAX has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to DFAU (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFAU dropped -23.61% vs DFAX's -28.15%.

On 3-year performance, DFAU leads with 21.97% vs 21.30% for DFAX. On fees, DFAU is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, DFAU has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAU has performed better with a 21.97% return vs 21.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAU is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DFAX.

DFAX has the higher dividend yield at 2.20%, compared with 0.89% for DFAU.

DFAU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DFAX is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for DFAU and 0.30% for DFAX.

DFAU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DFAU and DFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer